Publication:
Bevacizumab continuation beyond initial bevacizumab progression among recurrent glioblastoma patients

dc.contributor.authorD. A. Reardonen_US
dc.contributor.authorJ. E. Herndonen_US
dc.contributor.authorK. B. Petersen_US
dc.contributor.authorA. Desjardinsen_US
dc.contributor.authorA. Coanen_US
dc.contributor.authorE. Louen_US
dc.contributor.authorA. L. Sumrallen_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Turneren_US
dc.contributor.authorE. S. Lippen_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Sathornsumeteeen_US
dc.contributor.authorJ. N. Richen_US
dc.contributor.authorJ. H. Sampsonen_US
dc.contributor.authorA. H. Friedmanen_US
dc.contributor.authorS. T. Boultonen_US
dc.contributor.authorD. D. Bigneren_US
dc.contributor.authorH. S. Friedmanen_US
dc.contributor.authorJ. J. Vredenburghen_US
dc.contributor.otherDuke University School of Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherCleveland Clinic Foundationen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-11T04:33:12Z
dc.date.available2018-06-11T04:33:12Z
dc.date.issued2012-10-23en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Bevacizumab improves outcome for most recurrent glioblastoma patients, but the duration of benefit is limited and survival after initial bevacizumab progression is poor. We evaluated bevacizumab continuation beyond initial progression among recurrent glioblastoma patients as it is a common, yet unsupported practice in some countries. Methods: We analysed outcome among all patients (n99) who received subsequent therapy after progression on one of five consecutive, single-arm, phase II clinical trials evaluating bevacizumab regimens for recurrent glioblastoma. Of note, the five trials contained similar eligibility, treatment and assessment criteria, and achieved comparable outcome. Results: The median overall survival (OS) and OS at 6 months for patients who continued bevacizumab therapy (n55) were 5.9 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.4, 7.6) and 49.2% (95% CI: 35.2, 61.8), compared with 4.0 months (95% CI: 2.1, 5.4) and 29.5% (95% CI: 17.0, 43.2) for patients treated with a non-bevacizumab regimen (n44; P0.014). Bevacizumab continuation was an independent predictor of improved OS (hazard ratio0.64; P0.04). Conclusion: The results of our retrospective pooled analysis suggest that bevacizumab continuation beyond initial progression modestly improves survival compared with available non-bevacizumab therapy for recurrent glioblastoma patients require evaluation in an appropriately randomised, prospective trial. © 2012 Cancer Research UK All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Cancer. Vol.107, No.9 (2012), 1481-1487en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/bjc.2012.415en_US
dc.identifier.issn15321827en_US
dc.identifier.issn00070920en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84867900118en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/13588
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84867900118&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleBevacizumab continuation beyond initial bevacizumab progression among recurrent glioblastoma patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84867900118&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections