Publication:
Prevalence and Effect of Intestinal Infections Detected by a PCR-Based Stool Test in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

dc.contributor.authorJulajak Limsrivilaien_US
dc.contributor.authorZachary M. Salehen_US
dc.contributor.authorLaura A. Johnsonen_US
dc.contributor.authorRyan W. Stidhamen_US
dc.contributor.authorAkbar K. Waljeeen_US
dc.contributor.authorShail M. Govanien_US
dc.contributor.authorBrian Gutermuthen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlexandra M. Brownen_US
dc.contributor.authorEmily Briggsen_US
dc.contributor.authorKrishna Raoen_US
dc.contributor.authorPeter D.R. Higginsen_US
dc.contributor.otherVA Ann Arbor Healthcare Systemen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Michigan Medical Schoolen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arboren_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T04:34:38Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T04:34:38Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. Background: The advent of PCR-based stool testing has identified a greatly increased number of infectious agents in IBD, but their clinical significance is unknown. Aims: To determine the infectious agent prevalence and the clinical significance of these infectious agents in IBD patients. Methods: This cross-sectional study compared the prevalence of GI infections among IBD patients with active and quiescent disease versus healthy controls. Among actively inflamed patients, we compared clinical characteristics, medication use, and disease course between those with positive and negative tests. Results: Three hundred and thirty-three IBD patients and 52 healthy volunteers were included. The IBD group was divided into active Crohn’s disease (CD, n = 113), inactive CD (n = 53), active ulcerative colitis (UC, n = 128), and inactive UC (n = 39). A significantly higher percentage of actively inflamed patients had positive stool tests (31.1%) compared to those with quiescent disease (7.6%, P = < 0.001) and healthy controls (13.5%, P = 0.01). In actively inflamed patients, shorter symptom duration and the use of multiple immunosuppressive agents were significantly associated with positive stool tests. Escalation of immunosuppressive therapy was less frequent in those with positive (61.3%) than with negative tests (77.7%, P = < 0.01). However, the need for surgery (13.3% vs. 18.7%, respectively, P = 0.31) and hospitalization (14.7% vs. 17.5%, respectively, P = 0.57) in 90 days was not significantly different. Conclusion: GI infections are common in IBD patients with active disease. Evaluating patients for infection may help avoid unnecessary escalation of immunosuppressants, especially during an acute flare or combination immunosuppression.en_US
dc.identifier.citationDigestive Diseases and Sciences. (2020)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10620-020-06071-2en_US
dc.identifier.issn15732568en_US
dc.identifier.issn01632116en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85078201863en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/53613
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85078201863&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titlePrevalence and Effect of Intestinal Infections Detected by a PCR-Based Stool Test in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseaseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85078201863&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections