Publication:
Gap comparison between single crown and three-unit bridge zirconia substructures.

dc.contributor.authorChuchai Anunmanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorชูชัย อนันต์มานะen_US
dc.contributor.authorChanavut Asvanunden_US
dc.contributor.authorชนวุตม์ อัศวนันท์en_US
dc.contributor.authorMasnisa Charoenchitten_US
dc.contributor.correspondenceChuchai Anunmanaen_US
dc.contributor.correspondenceชูชัย อนันต์มานะ
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University. Faculty of Dentistry. Department of Prosthodonticsen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-16T11:21:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-08T09:06:39Z
dc.date.available2015-06-16T11:21:45Z
dc.date.available2016-12-08T09:06:39Z
dc.date.issued2014-08
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE To compare marginal and internal gaps of zirconia substructure of single crowns with those of three-unit fixed dental prostheses. MATERIALS AND METHODS Standardized Co-Cr alloy simulated second premolar and second molar abutments were fabricated and subsequently duplicated into type-III dental stone for working casts. After that, all zirconia substructures were made using Lava™ system. Marginal and internal gaps were measured in 2 planes (mesial-distal plane and buccal-palatal plane) at 5 locations: marginal opening (MO), chamfer area (CA), axial wall (AW), cusp tip (CT) and mid-occlusal (OA) using Replica technique. RESULTS There were significant differences between gaps at all locations. The mean ± SD of marginal gap in premolar was 43.6 ± 0.4 µm and 46.5 ± 0.5 µm for single crown and 3-unit bridge substructure respectively. For molar substructure the mean ± SD of marginal gap was 48.5 ± 0.4 µm and 52.6 ± 0.4 µm for single crown and 3-unit bridge respectively. The largest gaps were found at the occlusal area, which was 150.5 ± 0.5 µm and 154.5 ± 0.4 µm for single and 3-unit bridge premolar substructures respectively and 146.5 ± 0.4 µm and 211.5 ± 0.4 µm for single and 3-unit bridge molar substructure respectively. CONCLUSION Independent-samples t-test showed significant differences of gap in zirconia substructure between single crowns and three-unit bridge (P<.001). Therefore, the span length has the effect on the fit of zirconia substructure that is fabricated using CAD/CAM technique especially at the occlusal area.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAnunmana C, Charoenchitt M, Asvanund C. Gap comparison between single crown and three-unit bridge zirconia substructures. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014 Aug;6(4):253-8.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4047/jap.2014.6.4.253.
dc.identifier.issn2005-7806 (printed)
dc.identifier.issn2005-7814 (electronic)
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/935
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsMahidol University
dc.rights.holderKorean Academy of Prosthodonticsen_US
dc.subjectCAD/CAMen_US
dc.subjectMarginal fiten_US
dc.subject3-unit bridgeen_US
dc.subjectCeramicsen_US
dc.subjectZirconiaen_US
dc.subjectOpen Access articleen
dc.titleGap comparison between single crown and three-unit bridge zirconia substructures.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mods.location.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4146724/

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
dt-ar-chuchai-2014.pdf
Size:
973.71 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:

Collections