Publication: Gap comparison between single crown and three-unit bridge zirconia substructures.
dc.contributor.author | Chuchai Anunmana | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | ชูชัย อนันต์มานะ | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chanavut Asvanund | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | ชนวุตม์ อัศวนันท์ | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Masnisa Charoenchitt | en_US |
dc.contributor.correspondence | Chuchai Anunmana | en_US |
dc.contributor.correspondence | ชูชัย อนันต์มานะ | |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University. Faculty of Dentistry. Department of Prosthodontics | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-06-16T11:21:45Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-12-08T09:06:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-06-16T11:21:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-12-08T09:06:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-08 | |
dc.description.abstract | PURPOSE To compare marginal and internal gaps of zirconia substructure of single crowns with those of three-unit fixed dental prostheses. MATERIALS AND METHODS Standardized Co-Cr alloy simulated second premolar and second molar abutments were fabricated and subsequently duplicated into type-III dental stone for working casts. After that, all zirconia substructures were made using Lava™ system. Marginal and internal gaps were measured in 2 planes (mesial-distal plane and buccal-palatal plane) at 5 locations: marginal opening (MO), chamfer area (CA), axial wall (AW), cusp tip (CT) and mid-occlusal (OA) using Replica technique. RESULTS There were significant differences between gaps at all locations. The mean ± SD of marginal gap in premolar was 43.6 ± 0.4 µm and 46.5 ± 0.5 µm for single crown and 3-unit bridge substructure respectively. For molar substructure the mean ± SD of marginal gap was 48.5 ± 0.4 µm and 52.6 ± 0.4 µm for single crown and 3-unit bridge respectively. The largest gaps were found at the occlusal area, which was 150.5 ± 0.5 µm and 154.5 ± 0.4 µm for single and 3-unit bridge premolar substructures respectively and 146.5 ± 0.4 µm and 211.5 ± 0.4 µm for single and 3-unit bridge molar substructure respectively. CONCLUSION Independent-samples t-test showed significant differences of gap in zirconia substructure between single crowns and three-unit bridge (P<.001). Therefore, the span length has the effect on the fit of zirconia substructure that is fabricated using CAD/CAM technique especially at the occlusal area. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Anunmana C, Charoenchitt M, Asvanund C. Gap comparison between single crown and three-unit bridge zirconia substructures. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014 Aug;6(4):253-8. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4047/jap.2014.6.4.253. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2005-7806 (printed) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2005-7814 (electronic) | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/935 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.rights | Mahidol University | |
dc.rights.holder | Korean Academy of Prosthodontics | en_US |
dc.subject | CAD/CAM | en_US |
dc.subject | Marginal fit | en_US |
dc.subject | 3-unit bridge | en_US |
dc.subject | Ceramics | en_US |
dc.subject | Zirconia | en_US |
dc.subject | Open Access article | en |
dc.title | Gap comparison between single crown and three-unit bridge zirconia substructures. | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
mods.location.url | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4146724/ |