Publication:
Clinical performance and wear characteristics of veneered lithia-disilicate-based ceramic crowns

dc.contributor.authorKallaya Suputtamongkolen_US
dc.contributor.authorKenneth J. Anusaviceen_US
dc.contributor.authorChatcharee Suchatlampongen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhira Sithiamnuaien_US
dc.contributor.authorChantana Tulapornchaien_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Florida College of Dentistryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-12T02:25:17Z
dc.date.available2018-07-12T02:25:17Z
dc.date.issued2008-05-01en_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The objectives of this study were to characterize the clinical performance and wear characteristics of lithia-disilicate-based ceramic crowns. Methods: Thirty posterior crowns were made using the heat-pressing technique and lithia-disilicate-based core ceramic. Subjects were recalled annually. The quality of crowns and adjacent gingival tissues were examined using nine criteria for acceptability. All crowns were examined and ranked from 4 (Excellent) to 1 (Unacceptable) for each criterion. Impressions were made for replica models at each appointment. Wear characteristics of dental ceramic and enamel were obtained by comparing the surface of the original model with the follow-up model using a laser scanner. Results: Twenty-nine subjects returned for the 1-year recall examination. The maximum clenching force for the 30 subjects ranged from 125 to 815 N. All clinical criteria were ranked good to excellent at the 1-year recall exam and no fractures were observed. The mean occlusal wear volumes for the ceramic crowns after 1 year were 0.19 (0.065) mm3for premolar sites and 0.34 (0.08) mm3for molar sites. The mean occlusal wear volumes of opposing enamel after 1 year were 0.21 (0.06) mm3for premolar teeth and 0.50 (0.22) mm3for molar teeth. The mean occlusal wear volume of ceramic molar crowns was significantly lower than the volume of enamel wear of the opposing teeth (p ≤ 0.05). Conclusions: The quality of the overall prostheses and the gingival tissues were acceptable after 1 year. The mean occlusal wear volume of ceramic molar crowns was significantly lower than the enamel wear volume of the opposing teeth. © 2007 Academy of Dental Materials.en_US
dc.identifier.citationDental Materials. Vol.24, No.5 (2008), 667-673en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.033en_US
dc.identifier.issn01095641en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-40849124329en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/19165
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=40849124329&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectDentistryen_US
dc.titleClinical performance and wear characteristics of veneered lithia-disilicate-based ceramic crownsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=40849124329&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections