Publication:
Methylxanthine use for apnea of prematurity among an international cohort of neonatologists

dc.contributor.authorE. G. Abu Jawdehen_US
dc.contributor.authorM. O'Riordanen_US
dc.contributor.authorA. Limrungsikulen_US
dc.contributor.authorA. Bandyopadhyayen_US
dc.contributor.authorB. M. Argusen_US
dc.contributor.authorP. E. Nakaden_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Supapannacharten_US
dc.contributor.authorK. A. Yunisen_US
dc.contributor.authorP. G. Davisen_US
dc.contributor.authorR. J. Martinen_US
dc.contributor.otherRainbow Babies and Children's Hosp.en_US
dc.contributor.otherCase Western Reserve Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherRoyal Women's Hospital, Carltonen_US
dc.contributor.otherAmerican University of Beirut Medical Centeren_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-19T05:11:58Z
dc.date.available2018-10-19T05:11:58Z
dc.date.issued2013-11-25en_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: A recent multinational clinical trial in preterm infants has demonstrated pulmonary and neurodevelopmental benefits from caffeine therapy. Indications for caffeine use in that study were predominantly for treatment of apnea and facilitation of extubation rather than prophylaxis. There are no recent studies that describe current practice of neonatologists and regional differences in regards to indications for starting, monitoring and discontinuing methylxanthine therapy in premature infants. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the spectrum of current practice and demonstrate the extent to which methylxanthine therapy varies by location. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of all neonatologists in Thailand, Lebanon, Australia, and a representative sample in the USA regarding management of apnea of prematurity. RESULTS: The response rate was 50% (342/681). The methylxanthine of choice varied greatly across study locations. Prophylactic methylxanthine use is common (62%) among neonatologists in all four study locations. Significant variation exists in almost all aspects of apnea pharmacotherapy practice among neonatologists in different international locations. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic use of methylxanthine therapy for apnea of prematurity is widespread. We speculate that this expanded use is possibly attributed to the beneficial effects of caffeine therapy in the Caffeine for Apnea of Prematurity (CAP) Trial. © 2013-IOS Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine. Vol.6, No.3 (2013), 251-256en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/NPM-1371013en_US
dc.identifier.issn18784429en_US
dc.identifier.issn19345798en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84887978694en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/32075
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84887978694&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleMethylxanthine use for apnea of prematurity among an international cohort of neonatologistsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84887978694&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections