Publication:
Validation of the Thai version of the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ)

dc.contributor.authorWanchat Komonen_US
dc.contributor.authorJittima Manonaien_US
dc.contributor.authorAthasit Kijmanawaten_US
dc.contributor.authorChatchawan Silpakiten_US
dc.contributor.authorBhatarachit Tunkoonen_US
dc.contributor.authorKetkaew Jengpraserten_US
dc.contributor.authorSirirat Sarit-apiraken_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T11:04:06Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T11:04:06Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction and hypothesis: The Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ) was developed and validated to assess women’s knowledge regarding etiology, diagnosis and treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and urinary incontinence (UI). We aimed to translate and validate a Thai version of the PIKQ to use as a tool to evaluate knowledge of POP and UI among Thai-speaking women. Methods: The English PIKQ, which comprises the PIKQ-POP and PIKQ-UI sections, was translated into Thai. Psychometric properties of the final version of the Thai PIKQ were tested for content validity, construct validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability among 168 women attending a gynecology clinic and 150 nurses. Results: Regarding content validity of the final Thai PIKQ, the number of missing items was 0. Participants in the nurse group were more likely than those in the patient group to select the correct answer for all items for the POP scale and UI scale (P < 0.001). For internal consistency testing, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.745 for the PIKQ-POP and 0.754 for the PIKQ-UI scales, suggesting that the items had relatively high internal consistency. The item-total correlation values ranged from 0.204 to 0.539, showing an adequate correlation of each item with the scale overall. The correlation coefficients between the test and retest for PIKQ-POP and PIKQ-UI were 0.685 and 0.735, respectively (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The Thai PIKQ is a simple instrument which shows good validity and high reliability and could be a useful tool for assessing knowledge regarding POP and UI in clinical practice.en_US
dc.identifier.citationInternational Urogynecology Journal. (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00192-021-05020-5en_US
dc.identifier.issn14333023en_US
dc.identifier.issn09373462en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85121488712en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/78543
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85121488712&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleValidation of the Thai version of the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85121488712&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections