Publication:
Sectioning and extensively examining the fimbriated end (SEE-FIM) of the fallopian tube in routine practices, is it worth the effort?

dc.contributor.authorNatthawadee Laokulrathen_US
dc.contributor.authorMalee Warnnissornen_US
dc.contributor.authorTuenjai Chuangsuwanichen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuchanan Hanamornroongruangen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T10:02:00Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T10:02:00Z
dc.date.issued2019-03-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology Aim: To determine the prevalence of fallopian tube high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) and to analyze the benefit of the sectioning and extensively examining the fimbriated end (SEE-FIM) protocol. Methods: Fallopian tubes from 450 patients with risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, or tumor of the ovary, endometrium, fallopian tube or peritoneum were examined using the SEE-FIM protocol. Microscopic tubal pathology and the number of paraffin blocks used were evaluated. Immunostaining for p53 was performed to confirm TP53 mutation. Cost effectiveness was determined by equation of incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Results: Tubal HGSC were detected in 25 out of 70 cases of pelvic extrauterine HGSC, in 1 case of endometrioid carcinoma, and 4 cases of uterine serous carcinoma out of 250 cases of endometrial neoplasm. The mean number of tissue blocks per case was 6. The incremental cost for detecting one case of coexisting fallopian tube HGSC in the study population was 94 Thai baht/3 USD per case. Conclusion: The SEE-FIM protocol facilitates identification of lesions that are not distinguishable by classical sampling protocol, and this results in more accurate tumor staging and a better understanding of the carcinogenesis. The benefit of the SEE-FIM protocol was demonstrated, especially in cases at high risk for coexisting fallopian tube carcinoma.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. Vol.45, No.3 (2019), 665-670en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jog.13845en_US
dc.identifier.issn14470756en_US
dc.identifier.issn13418076en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85057730754en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/51816
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85057730754&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleSectioning and extensively examining the fimbriated end (SEE-FIM) of the fallopian tube in routine practices, is it worth the effort?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85057730754&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections