Publication:
Chemically induced behavioral responses in Anopheles minimus and Anopheles harrisoni in Thailand

dc.contributor.authorRungarun Tisgratogen_US
dc.contributor.authorChatchai Tananchaien_US
dc.contributor.authorMichael J. Bangsen_US
dc.contributor.authorKrajana Tainchumen_US
dc.contributor.authorWaraporn Juntarajumnongen_US
dc.contributor.authorAtchariya Prabaripaien_US
dc.contributor.authorKamlesh R. Chauhanen_US
dc.contributor.authorJinrapa Pothikasikornen_US
dc.contributor.authorTheeraphap Chareonviriyaphapen_US
dc.contributor.otherKasetsart Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherPT Freeport Indonesiaen_US
dc.contributor.otherUSDA ARS Beltsville Agricultural Research Centeren_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-03T07:55:07Z
dc.date.available2018-05-03T07:55:07Z
dc.date.issued2011-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBehavioral responses of female mosquitoes representing two species in the Minimus Complex exposed to an operational field dose of bifenthrin or DEET (N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide) were described using an excito-repellency test system. Two test populations of An. minimus, one from the field (Tak Province, western Thailand), the other from a long-established laboratory colony, and Anopheles harrisoni collected from Kanchanaburi Province, western Thailand, were used. Results showed that all test populations rapidly escaped after direct contact with surfaces treated with either bifenthrin or DEET compared to match-paired untreated controls. Greater escape response by exposed females to bifenthrin and DEET were observed in the An. minimus colony compared to the two field populations. Field-collected An. minimus demonstrated a more rapid escape response to DEET than to bifenthrin, whereas An. harrisoni showed a converse response. Although fewer females escaped from test chambers without direct contact with treated surfaces compared to contact tests, the spatial repellency response was significantly pronounced in all test populations compared to match-paired controls (P < 0.05). DEET was found to perform as both a contact stimulant and moderate spatial repellent. © 2011 The Society for Vector Ecology.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Vector Ecology. Vol.36, No.2 (2011), 321-331en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1948-7134.2011.00172.xen_US
dc.identifier.issn19487134en_US
dc.identifier.issn10811710en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-82655171803en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/11233
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=82655171803&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.titleChemically induced behavioral responses in Anopheles minimus and Anopheles harrisoni in Thailanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=82655171803&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections