Publication:
Speech camp for children with cleft lip and/or palate in Thailand

dc.contributor.authorBenjamas Prathaneeen_US
dc.contributor.authorPreeya Lorwatanapongsaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKalyanee Makarabhiromen_US
dc.contributor.authorRatchanee Suphawatjariyakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorWorawan Wattanawongsawangen_US
dc.contributor.authorSirinakorn Prohmtongen_US
dc.contributor.authorPanida Thanaviratananiten_US
dc.contributor.otherKhon Kaen Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherChulalongkorn Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherChiang Rai Prachanukhro Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherSaraburi Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherBumrungrat International Hospitalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-03T08:04:08Z
dc.date.available2018-05-03T08:04:08Z
dc.date.issued2011-02-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: There is a critical need for speech therapy services for people born with cleft lip and/or palate in developing countries. Objective: Assess the effectiveness of a speech camp and follow-up session for children with cleft lip and/or palate. Methods: A Community-Based Model for Speech therapy was implemented at Suwanaphum Hospital District, Roiet, Thailand. Thirteen children with cleft lip and/or palate (3; 6-13 years) attended a four-day speech camp and a one-day follow-up session (six months later) for remediation of their articulation disorders. Paraprofessional training was also provided. Pre- and post-tests were administered to the participants, caregivers, and paraprofessionals to determine the effectiveness of the program. A pre- and post-articulation test, as well as an audiological evaluation were administered. Five speech and language pathologists provided speech therapy, both individual and group, for a total of 18 hours during the four-day speech camp and six hours in the one-day follow-up session. The median difference of the number of articulation errors was determined by results of the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test. Results: There was a significant decrease in articulation errors following both the main speech camp and the follow-up session (z = 3.11, p < 0.01; z = 2.87, p < 0.01, respectively). Caregivers' and health care providers' satisfaction ratings for participation in the speech camps ranged from good to excellent. Conclusion: A Community-Based Model of both a speech camp and follow-up session provided an effective speech therapy treatment for children with cleft lip and/or palate.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAsian Biomedicine. Vol.5, No.1 (2011), 111-118en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5372/1905-7415.0501.013en_US
dc.identifier.issn1875855Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn19057415en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84871553722en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/11601
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84871553722&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleSpeech camp for children with cleft lip and/or palate in Thailanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84871553722&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections