Publication:
Safety and tolerability of nevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients receiving fluconazole for cryptococcal prophylaxis: A case-control study

dc.contributor.authorWeerawat Manosuthien_US
dc.contributor.authorNopphanath Chumpathaten_US
dc.contributor.authorAchara Chaovavanichen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomnuek Sungkanuparphen_US
dc.contributor.otherBamrasnaradura Infectious Disease Instituteen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-21T08:23:56Z
dc.date.available2018-06-21T08:23:56Z
dc.date.issued2005-08-24en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: To compare the adverse events after initiation of NVP-based ART among HIV-infected patients who did not receive fluconazole (group A), received fluconazole 400 mg/week (group B), and received fluconazole 200 mg/day (group C). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among HIV-infected patients who bagan NVP-based ART between December 2003 and September 2004. Patients were followed up for 6 months. Clinical hepatitis, elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (> 3 times from baseline), and skin rashes were studied. Results: There were 686 patients; 225, 392, and 69 patients in group A, B, and C, respectively. Baseline characteristics including age, previous opportunistic infections, use of antituberculous drugs, and baseline aminotransferase levels among the three groups were similar. Group C had a higher proportion of men (p = 0.016). Baseline median (IQR) CD4 cell counts were 85 (21-159), 18 (7-48), and 16 (5-35) cell/mm3 in group A, B, and C, respectively (p < 0.001). Of 2/225 (0.9%), 4/392 (1.0%), and 0/69 (0%) patients in group A, B, and C developed clinical hepatitis (p = 0.705). There were no significant difference of elevated AST or ALT among the three groups (p > 0.05). By logistic regression, receiving fluconazole was not predictive of clinical hepatitis, elevated aminotransferase, or skin rashes. At 6 months after initiating NVP, 174 (77.3%) patients in group A, 309 (78.8%) patients in group B, and 58 (84.1%) patients in group C remained on NVP. Conclusion: Initiation of NVP-based ART among Thais with advance HIV disease receiving fluconazole is safe and well-tolerated. NVP should not be contraindicated for patients receiving fluconazole for treatment or prophylaxis of cryptococcosis. © 2005 Manosuthi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBMC Infectious Diseases. Vol.5, (2005)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2334-5-67en_US
dc.identifier.issn14712334en_US
dc.identifier.issn14712334en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-27244450276en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/16852
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=27244450276&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleSafety and tolerability of nevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients receiving fluconazole for cryptococcal prophylaxis: A case-control studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=27244450276&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections