Publication: Pulpal blood flow recorded from human premolar teeth with a laser Doppler flow meter using either red or infrared light
dc.contributor.author | Kanittha Kijsamanmith | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Siriporn Timpawat | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Noppakun Vongsavan | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Bruce Matthews | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | University of Bristol | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-05-03T08:01:49Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-05-03T08:01:49Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011-07-01 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To compare red (635 nm) and infrared (780 nm) light for recording pulpal blood flow from human premolar teeth. Design: Recordings were made from 11 healthy teeth in 9 subjects (aged 16-30 years) using a laser Doppler flow meter (Periflux 4001) equipped with both red and infrared lasers. Average blood flow signals were obtained with both light sources alternately from each tooth under five conditions: intact tooth without opaque rubber dam, intact tooth with dam, after injecting local anaesthetic (3% Mepivacaine) (LA) over the apex of the tooth and cavity preparation to almost expose the pulp, after removal and replacement of the pulp, and with the root canal empty. Results: With infrared light, the dam significantly decreased the mean blood flow by 80%. Injecting LA and cavity preparation had no significant effect. Removal and replacement of the pulp reduced the mean blood flow by 58%. There was no further change when the pulp was removed. With red light, the dam reduced the signal from intact teeth by 60%. Injecting LA and cavity preparation had no significant effect. The signal fell by 67% after pulp removal and replacement and did not change significantly when the pulp was removed. Conclusions: Opaque rubber dam minimises the contribution of non-pulpal tissues to the laser Doppler signal recorded from premolars. Using dam, the pulp contributed about 60% to the blood flow signal with both red and infrared light. The difference between them in this respect was not significant. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Archives of Oral Biology. Vol.56, No.7 (2011), 629-633 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2010.12.003 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 00039969 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-79959380542 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/11520 | |
dc.rights | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | en_US |
dc.source.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79959380542&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.subject | Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | en_US |
dc.subject | Dentistry | en_US |
dc.subject | Medicine | en_US |
dc.title | Pulpal blood flow recorded from human premolar teeth with a laser Doppler flow meter using either red or infrared light | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79959380542&origin=inward | en_US |