Publication: Self-management interventions for adults with stroke: A scoping review
Issued Date
2021-09-01
Resource Type
ISSN
2095882X
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85112333668
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine. Vol.7, No.3 (2021), 139-148
Suggested Citation
Suebsarn Ruksakulpiwat, Wendie Zhou Self-management interventions for adults with stroke: A scoping review. Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine. Vol.7, No.3 (2021), 139-148. doi:10.1016/j.cdtm.2021.03.001 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/77909
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Self-management interventions for adults with stroke: A scoping review
Author(s)
Abstract
Background: Stroke is a principal cause of mortality and disability globally. Numerous studies have contributed to the knowledge base regarding self-management interventions among chronic disease patients, but there are few such studies for patients with stroke. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze self-management interventions among stroke patients. This scoping review aimed to systematically identify and describe randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of self-management interventions for adults with stroke. Methods: A review team carried out a scoping review on stroke and self-management interventions based on the methodology of Arksey and O'Malley, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL Plus Full Text, Medline Plus Full Text, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to July 2020. Results: Fifty-four RCTs were included. The most popular study design is comparing a self-management intervention to usual care or waitlist control condition. Physical activity is the most common intervention topic, and interventions were mainly delivered face to face. The majority of interventions were located in inpatient and multiple settings. Interventions were conducted by various providers, with nurses the most common provider group. Symptom management was the most frequently reported outcome domain that improved. Conclusions: Self-management interventions benefit the symptom management of stroke patients a lot. The reasonable time for intervention is at least 6–12 months. Multifarious intervention topics, delivery formats, and providers are adopted mostly to meet the multiple needs of this population. Physical activity was the most popular topic currently. Studies comparing the effect of different types of self-management interventions are required in the future.