Publication:
Antibiotics and activity spaces: Protocol of an exploratory study of behaviour, marginalisation and knowledge diffusion

dc.contributor.authorMarco J. Haenssgenen_US
dc.contributor.authorNutcha Charoenboonen_US
dc.contributor.authorGiacomo Zanelloen_US
dc.contributor.authorMayfong Mayxayen_US
dc.contributor.authorFelix Reed-Tsochasen_US
dc.contributor.authorCaroline O.H. Jonesen_US
dc.contributor.authorRomyen Kosaikanonten_US
dc.contributor.authorPollavat Praphattongen_US
dc.contributor.authorPathompong Manohanen_US
dc.contributor.authorYoel Lubellen_US
dc.contributor.authorPaul N. Newtonen_US
dc.contributor.authorSommay Keomanyen_US
dc.contributor.authorHeiman F.L. Wertheimen_US
dc.contributor.authorJeffrey Lienerten_US
dc.contributor.authorThipphaphone Xayavongen_US
dc.contributor.authorPenporn Warapikuptanunen_US
dc.contributor.authorYuzana Khine Zawen_US
dc.contributor.authorPatchapoom U-Thongen_US
dc.contributor.authorPatipat Benjaroonen_US
dc.contributor.authorNarinnira Sangkhamen_US
dc.contributor.authorKanokporn Wibunjaken_US
dc.contributor.authorPoowadon Chai-Inen_US
dc.contributor.authorSirirat Chailerten_US
dc.contributor.authorPatthanan Thavethanutthanawinen_US
dc.contributor.authorKrittanon Promsutten_US
dc.contributor.authorAmphayvone Thepkhamkongen_US
dc.contributor.authorNicksan Sithongdengen_US
dc.contributor.authorMaipheth Keovilayvanhen_US
dc.contributor.authorNid Khamsoukthavongen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhaengnitta Phanthasomchiten_US
dc.contributor.authorChanthasone Phanthavongen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomsanith Boualaisengen_US
dc.contributor.authorSouksakhone Vongsavangen_US
dc.contributor.authorRachel C. Greeren_US
dc.contributor.authorThomas Althausen_US
dc.contributor.authorSupalert Nedsuwanen_US
dc.contributor.authorDaranee Intralawanen_US
dc.contributor.authorTri Wangrangsimakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorDirek Limmathurotsakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorProochista Arianaen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Oxford, Saïd Business Schoolen_US
dc.contributor.otherWellcome Trust Research Laboratories Nairobien_US
dc.contributor.otherLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherGreen Templeton Collegeen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Oxforden_US
dc.contributor.otherMae Fah Luang Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNational Human Genome Research Instituteen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Readingen_US
dc.contributor.otherNuffield Department of Clinical Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Health Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.otherMedical Microbiology Departmenten_US
dc.contributor.otherOxford University Clinical Research Unit (OUCRU)en_US
dc.contributor.otherSalavan Provincial Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherChiangrai Prachanukroh Hospitalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-28T06:22:59Z
dc.date.available2019-08-28T06:22:59Z
dc.date.issued2018-03-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health priority. Leading UK and global strategy papers to fight AMR recognise its social and behavioural dimensions, but current policy responses to improve the popular use of antimicrobials (eg, antibiotics) are limited to education and awareness-raising campaigns. In response to conceptual, methodological and empirical weaknesses of this approach, we study people's antibiotic-related health behaviour through three research questions. RQ1: What are the manifestations and determinants of problematic antibiotic use in patients' healthcare-seeking pathways? RQ2: Will people's exposure to antibiotic awareness activities entail changed behaviours that diffuse or dissipate within a network of competing healthcare practices? RQ3: Which proxy indicators facilitate the detection of problematic antibiotic behaviours across and within communities? Methods We apply an interdisciplinary analytical framework that draws on the public health, medical anthropology, sociology and development economics literature. Our research involves social surveys of treatment-seeking behaviour among rural dwellers in northern Thailand (Chiang Rai) and southern Lao PDR (Salavan). We sample approximately 4800 adults to produce district-level representative and social network data. Additional 60 cognitive interviews facilitate survey instrument development and data interpretation. Our survey data analysis techniques include event sequence analysis (RQ1), multilevel regression (RQ1-3), social network analysis (RQ2) and latent class analysis (RQ3). Discussion Social research in AMR is nascent, but our unprecedentedly detailed data on microlevel treatment-seeking behaviour can contribute an understanding of behaviour beyond awareness and free choice, highlighting, for example, decision-making constraints, problems of marginalisation and lacking access to healthcare and competing ideas about desirable behaviour. trial registration number NCT03241316; Pre-results.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Global Health. Vol.3, No.2 (2018)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000621en_US
dc.identifier.issn20597908en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85056625843en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/46931
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85056625843&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleAntibiotics and activity spaces: Protocol of an exploratory study of behaviour, marginalisation and knowledge diffusionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85056625843&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections