Publication:
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation in motor rehabilitation after stroke: An update

dc.contributor.authorW. Klomjaien_US
dc.contributor.authorA. Lackmy-Valléeen_US
dc.contributor.authorN. Rocheen_US
dc.contributor.authorP. Pradat-Diehlen_US
dc.contributor.authorV. Marchand-Pauverten_US
dc.contributor.authorR. Katzen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherLaboratoire d'Imagerie Biomedicaleen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity Versailles-Saint-Quentinen_US
dc.contributor.otherHopital Raymond Poincareen_US
dc.contributor.otherAP-HP Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Parisen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-23T10:37:38Z
dc.date.available2018-11-23T10:37:38Z
dc.date.issued2015-09-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. Stroke is a leading cause of adult motor disability. The number of stroke survivors is increasing in industrialized countries, and despite available treatments used in rehabilitation, the recovery of motor functions after stroke is often incomplete. Studies in the 1980s showed that non-invasive brain stimulation (mainly repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation [rTMS] and transcranial direct current stimulation [tDCS]) could modulate cortical excitability and induce plasticity in healthy humans. These findings have opened the way to the therapeutic use of the 2 techniques for stroke. The mechanisms underlying the cortical effect of rTMS and tDCS differ. This paper summarizes data obtained in healthy subjects and gives a general review of the use of rTMS and tDCS in stroke patients with altered motor functions. From 1988 to 2012, approximately 1400 publications were devoted to the study of non-invasive brain stimulation in humans. However, for stroke patients with limb motor deficit, only 141 publications have been devoted to the effects of rTMS and 132 to those of tDCS. The Cochrane review devoted to the effects of rTMS found 19 randomized controlled trials involving 588 patients, and that devoted to tDCS found 18 randomized controlled trials involving 450 patients. Without doubt, rTMS and tDCS contribute to physiological and pathophysiological studies in motor control. However, despite the increasing number of studies devoted to the possible therapeutic use of non-invasive brain stimulation to improve motor recovery after stroke, further studies will be necessary to specify their use in rehabilitation.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. Vol.58, No.4 (2015), 220-224en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rehab.2015.05.006en_US
dc.identifier.issn18770665en_US
dc.identifier.issn18770657en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84941996143en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/36342
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84941996143&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation in motor rehabilitation after stroke: An updateen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84941996143&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections