Publication: Spatial Distribution and Population Estimation of Dogs in Thailand: Implications for Rabies Prevention and Control
5
Issued Date
2021-12-21
Resource Type
ISSN
22971769
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85122261775
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Frontiers in Veterinary Science. Vol.8, (2021)
Suggested Citation
Weerapong Thanapongtharm, Suwicha Kasemsuwan, Vilaiporn Wongphruksasoong, Khemmapat Boonyo, Tanu Pinyopummintr, Anuwat Wiratsudakul, Marius Gilbert, Kansuda Leelahapongsathon Spatial Distribution and Population Estimation of Dogs in Thailand: Implications for Rabies Prevention and Control. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. Vol.8, (2021). doi:10.3389/fvets.2021.790701 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/79138
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Spatial Distribution and Population Estimation of Dogs in Thailand: Implications for Rabies Prevention and Control
Abstract
Poor management of dog populations causes many problems in different countries, including rabies. To strategically design a dog population management, certain sets of data are required, such as the population size and spatial distribution of dogs. However, these data are rarely available or incomplete. Hence, this study aimed to describe the characteristics of dog populations in Thailand, explore their spatial distribution and relevant factors, and estimate the number of dogs in the whole country. First, four districts were selected as representatives of each region. Each district was partitioned into grids with a 300-m resolution. The selected grids were then surveyed, and the number of dogs and related data were collected. Random forest models with a two-part approach were used to quantify the association between the surveyed dog population and predictor variables. The spatial distribution of dog populations was then predicted. A total of 1,750 grids were surveyed (945 grids with dog presence and 805 grids with dog absence). Among the surveyed dogs, 86.6% (12,027/13,895) were owned. Of these, 51% were classified as independent, followed by confined (25%), semi-independent (21%), and unidentified dogs (3%). Seventy-two percent (1,348/1,868) of the ownerless dogs were feral, and the rest were community dogs. The spatial pattern of the dog populations was highly distributed in big cities such as Bangkok and its suburbs. In owned dogs, it was linked to household demographics, whereas it was related to community factors in ownerless dogs. The number of estimated dogs in the entire country was 12.8 million heads including 11.2 million owned dogs (21.7 heads/km2) and 1.6 million ownerless dogs (3.2 heads/km2). The methods developed here are extrapolatable to a larger area and use much less budget and manpower compared to the present practices. Our results are helpful for canine rabies prevention and control programs, such as dog population management and control and rabies vaccine allocation.