Publication:
Lactic acid bacteria from healthy oral cavity of Thai volunteers: Inhibition of oral pathogens

dc.contributor.authorS. Sookkheeen_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Chulasirien_US
dc.contributor.authorW. Prachyabrueden_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-07T09:36:40Z
dc.date.available2018-09-07T09:36:40Z
dc.date.issued2001-02-27en_US
dc.description.abstractThe aims of the present study were to screen and characterize the antimicrobial lactic acid bacteria which were isolated from healthy oral cavities of Thai volunteers, and to characterize their inhibiting substances. Among 3790 isolates (suspected to be lactic acid bacteria) from 130 volunteers, five showed an appreciable effect against Sarcina lutea ATCC 9341, Bacillus cereus ATCC 11778, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, Streptococcus mutans DTMU 1, Strep. salivarius DTMU 1, Strep. sanguis DTMU 1, Candida albicans ATCC 13803 and C. albicans DTMU 2, as well as the oral pathogens. These antimicrobial isolates included L17 and N14 which showed the antibacterial activity, D14 which showed the anticandidal activity, and D6 and N8 which showed both the antibacterial and anticandidal activities. The isolates were later found to be facultative anaerobic, Gram-positive, non-spore-forming, non-capsule-forming and catalase-negative bacilli. They could utilize casein but could not hydrolyse starch, and they produced hydrogen peroxide and bacteriocins. Their antimicrobial potentials were found to be affected by pH, catalase, proteolytic enzymes and temperature. The activity was partially inactivated after catalase treatment, significantly declined at pH ≥9.0 or after trypsin and pepsin treatments, and also reduced after heating at ≥100°C. However, the antimicrobial activity of these five isolates was somewhat resistant to heat. When the isolates were tested for their antimicrobial sensitivity, they were shown to be sensitive to a number of antimicrobial agents. The final identification revealed that D6, D14 and N14 were Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei, and L17 and N8 were Lact. rhamnosus.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Applied Microbiology. Vol.90, No.2 (2001), 172-179en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01229.xen_US
dc.identifier.issn13645072en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-0035133882en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/26403
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0035133882&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.titleLactic acid bacteria from healthy oral cavity of Thai volunteers: Inhibition of oral pathogensen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0035133882&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections