Publication: Acceptance of e-learning for users in higher education: An extension of the technology acceptance model
Issued Date
2011-12-01
Resource Type
ISSN
19936125
18185800
18185800
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-84855366582
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Social Sciences. Vol.6, No.6 (2011), 513-520
Suggested Citation
Veera Bhatiasevi Acceptance of e-learning for users in higher education: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Social Sciences. Vol.6, No.6 (2011), 513-520. doi:10.3923/sscience.2011.513.520 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/12861
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Acceptance of e-learning for users in higher education: An extension of the technology acceptance model
Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
The emergence of e-learning has been possible due to the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) which enables the creation, fostering, delivering and the facilitation of learning, anytime and anywhere. The Thai government has been the driving force behind the growth of e-learning as evident by the national ICT plans. However, although there has been initiatives by the government and adoption by universities very few studies have been conducted about e-learning in Thailand and little of which is known to the international field of e-learning. It is therefore, interesting to understand the level of adoption made by these universities and what factors affect acceptance of the e-learning systems. The study proposes the following variables an extension to the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM); Computer Self-efficacy (CSE), System Functionality (SF) and Teaching Materials (TM). Data was collected from 207 participants in Thailand in an undergraduate program. Satisfactory reliability and validity checks were performed followed by the testing of the structural model using AMOS. Results indicate that CSE, SF and TM have a positive effect with Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) while TM also has a positive effect with Perceived Usefulness (PU). PU positively effects Intention to Use (ITU) while PEOU posits a positive effect with PU. Suggestions for researchers and practitioners are discussed. © Medwell Journals, 2011.