Publication:
Enhanced ziprasidone combination therapy effectiveness in obese compared to nonobese patients with bipolar disorder

dc.contributor.authorShefali Milleren_US
dc.contributor.authorPichai Ittasakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorPo W. Wangen_US
dc.contributor.authorShelley J. Hillen_US
dc.contributor.authorMeredith E. Childersen_US
dc.contributor.authorNatalie Rasgonen_US
dc.contributor.authorTerence A. Ketteren_US
dc.contributor.otherStanford University School of Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-11T04:59:50Z
dc.date.available2018-06-11T04:59:50Z
dc.date.issued2012-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To assess longer-term ziprasidone effectiveness in obese and non-obese patients with bipolar disorder (BD). METHODS: Outpatients assessed with the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for BD Affective Disorders Evaluation and monitored with the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for BD Clinical Monitoring Form received open ziprasidone. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients (39 patients with BD I, 39 patients with BD II, and 4 patients with BD not otherwise specified; mean age, 41.1 years; females, 78.0%; obese, 48.8%) received ziprasidone combined with an average of 3.6 (in 74.4% at least 3) other prescription psychotropics and 1.2 prescription nonpsychotropics. Mean (median) ziprasidone final dose and duration were 134.3 (150) mg/d and 489 (199.5) days, respectively. Ziprasidone yielded in obese compared to nonobese patients less discontinuation (42.5% vs 71.4%, P = 0.01), albeit with a higher rate of addition of subsequent psychotropic medication (62.5% vs 35.7%, P = 0.03). Moreover, obese compared to nonobese patients had a higher rate of shift to final-visit euthymia (27.5% vs 0.0%, P = 0.0002), and more weight loss (-20.7 lbs vs -0.6 lbs, P = 0.001), and obese (but not nonobese) patients had significant improvements in mean Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (decreased 0.6 points; P = 0.03) and Global Assessment of Functioning (increased 3.3 points, P = 0.01) scores. Weight change correlated significantly with Global Assessment of Functioning change (P = 0.047) but not with Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness change. Limitations are small sample size and open-label, uncontrolled, observational design. CONCLUSION: Controlled and additional observational studies seem warranted to confirm our preliminary findings suggesting ziprasidone may be more effective in obese compared to nonobese patients with BD already receiving combination pharmacotherapy. Copyright © 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Psychopharmacology. Vol.32, No.6 (2012), 814-819en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/JCP.0b013e318270dea9en_US
dc.identifier.issn1533712Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn02710749en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84870253681en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/14467
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84870253681&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleEnhanced ziprasidone combination therapy effectiveness in obese compared to nonobese patients with bipolar disorderen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84870253681&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections