Publication:
Ultrasound Versus Traditional Palpation to Guide Radial Artery Cannulation in Critically Ill Children: A Randomized Trial: A

dc.contributor.authorNattachai Anantasiten_US
dc.contributor.authorPimporn Cheeptinnakorntawornen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnant Khositsethen_US
dc.contributor.authorRojjanee Lertbunrianen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarut Chantraen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-21T07:49:29Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T08:03:44Z
dc.date.available2018-12-21T07:49:29Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T08:03:44Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2017 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Objectives: To identify success rates for radial artery cannulation in a pediatric critical care unit using either palpation or ultrasound guidance to cannulate the radial artery. Methods: A prospective randomized comparative study of critically ill children who required invasive monitoring in a tertiary referral center was conducted. All patients were randomized by a stratified block of 4 to either ultrasound-guided or traditional palpation radial artery cannulation. The primary outcomes were the first attempt and total success rates. Results: Eighty-four children were enrolled, with 43 randomized to the palpation technique and 41 to the ultrasound-guided technique. Demographic data between the groups were not significantly different. The total success and first attempt rates for the ultrasound-guided group were significantly higher than those for the palpation group (success ratio, 2.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-3.64; P =.018; and success ratio, 4.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.57-11.14; P =.004, respectively). The median time to success for the ultrasound-guided group was significantly shorter than that for the palpation group (3.3 versus 10.4 minutes; P <.001). Cannulation complications were lower in the ultrasound-guided group than the palpation group (12.5% versus 53.3%; P <.001). Conclusions: The ultrasound-guided technique could improve the success rate and allow for faster cannulation of radial artery catheterization in critically ill children.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine. Vol.36, No.12 (2017), 2495-2501en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jum.14291en_US
dc.identifier.issn15509613en_US
dc.identifier.issn02784297en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85040835199en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/42707
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85040835199&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectHealth Professionsen_US
dc.titleUltrasound Versus Traditional Palpation to Guide Radial Artery Cannulation in Critically Ill Children: A Randomized Trial: Aen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85040835199&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections