Publication: Ultrasound Versus Traditional Palpation to Guide Radial Artery Cannulation in Critically Ill Children: A Randomized Trial: A
dc.contributor.author | Nattachai Anantasit | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Pimporn Cheeptinnakorntaworn | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Anant Khositseth | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Rojjanee Lertbunrian | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Marut Chantra | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-12-21T07:49:29Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-03-14T08:03:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-12-21T07:49:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-03-14T08:03:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-12-01 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | © 2017 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Objectives: To identify success rates for radial artery cannulation in a pediatric critical care unit using either palpation or ultrasound guidance to cannulate the radial artery. Methods: A prospective randomized comparative study of critically ill children who required invasive monitoring in a tertiary referral center was conducted. All patients were randomized by a stratified block of 4 to either ultrasound-guided or traditional palpation radial artery cannulation. The primary outcomes were the first attempt and total success rates. Results: Eighty-four children were enrolled, with 43 randomized to the palpation technique and 41 to the ultrasound-guided technique. Demographic data between the groups were not significantly different. The total success and first attempt rates for the ultrasound-guided group were significantly higher than those for the palpation group (success ratio, 2.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-3.64; P =.018; and success ratio, 4.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.57-11.14; P =.004, respectively). The median time to success for the ultrasound-guided group was significantly shorter than that for the palpation group (3.3 versus 10.4 minutes; P <.001). Cannulation complications were lower in the ultrasound-guided group than the palpation group (12.5% versus 53.3%; P <.001). Conclusions: The ultrasound-guided technique could improve the success rate and allow for faster cannulation of radial artery catheterization in critically ill children. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. Vol.36, No.12 (2017), 2495-2501 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/jum.14291 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 15509613 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 02784297 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-85040835199 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/42707 | |
dc.rights | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | en_US |
dc.source.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85040835199&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.subject | Health Professions | en_US |
dc.title | Ultrasound Versus Traditional Palpation to Guide Radial Artery Cannulation in Critically Ill Children: A Randomized Trial: A | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85040835199&origin=inward | en_US |