Publication: RELAx - REstricted versus Liberal positive end-expiratory pressure in patients without ARDS: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial
dc.contributor.author | Anna Geke Algera | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Luigi Pisani | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Dennis C.J. Bergmans | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sylvia den Boer | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Corianne A.J. de Borgie | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Frank H. Bosch | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Karina Bruin | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Thomas G. Cherpanath | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Rogier M. Determann | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Arjen M. Dondorp | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Dave A. Dongelmans | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Henrik Endeman | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Jasper J. Haringman | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Janneke Horn | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Nicole P. Juffermans | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | David M. van Meenen | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Nardo J. van der Meer | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Maruschka P. Merkus | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Hazra S. Moeniralam | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ilse Purmer | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Pieter Roel Tuinman | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mathilde Slabbekoorn | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Peter E. Spronk | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Alexander P.J. Vlaar | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Marcelo Gama de Abreu | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Paolo Pelosi | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ary Serpa Neto | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Marcus J. Schultz | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Frederique Paulus | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Ospedale Policlinico San Martino | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Gelre Ziekenhuizen | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Amphia Hospital | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | HagaZiekenhuis | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | St. Antonius Ziekenhuis | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Dresden University Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Our Lady Hospital - Amsterdam | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | University Hospital Maastricht | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Isala Clinics | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Amsterdam UMC - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Spaarne Gasthuis | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Rijnstate | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Haaglanden Medical Center | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-28T06:09:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-28T06:09:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-05-09 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | © 2018 The Author(s). Background: Evidence for benefit of high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is largely lacking for invasively ventilated, critically ill patients with uninjured lungs. We hypothesize that ventilation with low PEEP is noninferior to ventilation with high PEEP with regard to the number of ventilator-free days and being alive at day 28 in this population. Methods/Design: The "REstricted versus Liberal positive end-expiratory pressure in patients without ARDS" trial (RELAx) is a national, multicenter, randomized controlled, noninferiority trial in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with uninjured lungs who are expected not to be extubated within 24 h. RELAx will run in 13 ICUs in the Netherlands to enroll 980 patients under invasive ventilation. In all patients, low tidal volumes are used. Patients assigned to ventilation with low PEEP will receive the lowest possible PEEP between 0 and 5 cm H 2 O, while patients assigned to ventilation with high PEEP will receive PEEP of 8 cm H 2 O. The primary endpoint is the number of ventilator-free days and being alive at day 28, a composite endpoint for liberation from the ventilator and mortality until day 28, with a noninferiority margin for a difference between groups of 0.5 days. Secondary endpoints are length of stay (LOS), mortality, and occurrence of pulmonary complications, including severe hypoxemia, major atelectasis, need for rescue therapies, pneumonia, pneumothorax, and development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Hemodynamic support and sedation needs will be collected and compared. Discussion: RELAx will be the first sufficiently sized randomized controlled trial in invasively ventilated, critically ill patients with uninjured lungs using a clinically relevant and objective endpoint to determine whether invasive, low-tidal-volume ventilation with low PEEP is noninferior to ventilation with high PEEP. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Trials. Vol.19, No.1 (2018) | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s13063-018-2640-5 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 17456215 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-85046693906 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/46669 | |
dc.rights | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | en_US |
dc.source.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85046693906&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.subject | Medicine | en_US |
dc.title | RELAx - REstricted versus Liberal positive end-expiratory pressure in patients without ARDS: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85046693906&origin=inward | en_US |