Publication:
RELAx - REstricted versus Liberal positive end-expiratory pressure in patients without ARDS: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial

dc.contributor.authorAnna Geke Algeraen_US
dc.contributor.authorLuigi Pisanien_US
dc.contributor.authorDennis C.J. Bergmansen_US
dc.contributor.authorSylvia den Boeren_US
dc.contributor.authorCorianne A.J. de Borgieen_US
dc.contributor.authorFrank H. Boschen_US
dc.contributor.authorKarina Bruinen_US
dc.contributor.authorThomas G. Cherpanathen_US
dc.contributor.authorRogier M. Determannen_US
dc.contributor.authorArjen M. Dondorpen_US
dc.contributor.authorDave A. Dongelmansen_US
dc.contributor.authorHenrik Endemanen_US
dc.contributor.authorJasper J. Haringmanen_US
dc.contributor.authorJanneke Hornen_US
dc.contributor.authorNicole P. Juffermansen_US
dc.contributor.authorDavid M. van Meenenen_US
dc.contributor.authorNardo J. van der Meeren_US
dc.contributor.authorMaruschka P. Merkusen_US
dc.contributor.authorHazra S. Moeniralamen_US
dc.contributor.authorIlse Purmeren_US
dc.contributor.authorPieter Roel Tuinmanen_US
dc.contributor.authorMathilde Slabbekoornen_US
dc.contributor.authorPeter E. Spronken_US
dc.contributor.authorAlexander P.J. Vlaaren_US
dc.contributor.authorMarcelo Gama de Abreuen_US
dc.contributor.authorPaolo Pelosien_US
dc.contributor.authorAry Serpa Netoen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarcus J. Schultzen_US
dc.contributor.authorFrederique Paulusen_US
dc.contributor.otherOspedale Policlinico San Martinoen_US
dc.contributor.otherGelre Ziekenhuizenen_US
dc.contributor.otherAmphia Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherHagaZiekenhuisen_US
dc.contributor.otherSt. Antonius Ziekenhuisen_US
dc.contributor.otherDresden University Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carusen_US
dc.contributor.otherOur Lady Hospital - Amsterdamen_US
dc.contributor.otherHospital Israelita Albert Einsteinen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity Hospital Maastrichten_US
dc.contributor.otherIsala Clinicsen_US
dc.contributor.otherAmsterdam UMC - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdamen_US
dc.contributor.otherAmsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdamen_US
dc.contributor.otherSpaarne Gasthuisen_US
dc.contributor.otherRijnstateen_US
dc.contributor.otherHaaglanden Medical Centeren_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-28T06:09:08Z
dc.date.available2019-08-28T06:09:08Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-09en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018 The Author(s). Background: Evidence for benefit of high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is largely lacking for invasively ventilated, critically ill patients with uninjured lungs. We hypothesize that ventilation with low PEEP is noninferior to ventilation with high PEEP with regard to the number of ventilator-free days and being alive at day 28 in this population. Methods/Design: The "REstricted versus Liberal positive end-expiratory pressure in patients without ARDS" trial (RELAx) is a national, multicenter, randomized controlled, noninferiority trial in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with uninjured lungs who are expected not to be extubated within 24 h. RELAx will run in 13 ICUs in the Netherlands to enroll 980 patients under invasive ventilation. In all patients, low tidal volumes are used. Patients assigned to ventilation with low PEEP will receive the lowest possible PEEP between 0 and 5 cm H 2 O, while patients assigned to ventilation with high PEEP will receive PEEP of 8 cm H 2 O. The primary endpoint is the number of ventilator-free days and being alive at day 28, a composite endpoint for liberation from the ventilator and mortality until day 28, with a noninferiority margin for a difference between groups of 0.5 days. Secondary endpoints are length of stay (LOS), mortality, and occurrence of pulmonary complications, including severe hypoxemia, major atelectasis, need for rescue therapies, pneumonia, pneumothorax, and development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Hemodynamic support and sedation needs will be collected and compared. Discussion: RELAx will be the first sufficiently sized randomized controlled trial in invasively ventilated, critically ill patients with uninjured lungs using a clinically relevant and objective endpoint to determine whether invasive, low-tidal-volume ventilation with low PEEP is noninferior to ventilation with high PEEP.en_US
dc.identifier.citationTrials. Vol.19, No.1 (2018)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13063-018-2640-5en_US
dc.identifier.issn17456215en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85046693906en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/46669
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85046693906&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleRELAx - REstricted versus Liberal positive end-expiratory pressure in patients without ARDS: Protocol for a randomized controlled trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85046693906&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections