Publication:
Mesh fixation technique in totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair – A network meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorSuphakarn Techapongsatornen_US
dc.contributor.authorAmarit Tansaweten_US
dc.contributor.authorWisit Kasetsermwiriyaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMark McEvoyen_US
dc.contributor.authorJohn Attiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorChumpon Wilasrusmeeen_US
dc.contributor.authorAmmarin Thakkinstianen_US
dc.contributor.otherVajira Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Newcastle, Faculty of Health and Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T09:38:52Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T09:38:52Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018 The Authors Laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair is the standard option for inguinal hernia treatment. However, there are various types of mesh fixation and their relative uses are still controversial. This network meta-analysis was conducted to compare and rank the different fixations available for TEP. Medline and Scopus databases were search until February 1, 2017 and using randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes between different mesh fixation techniques were included. The results demonstrated that fifteen RCTs (n = 1783) were eligible for pooling. Five types of mesh fixation were used; metallic tack, no-fixation, absorbable tack, suture, and glue. Network meta-analysis that use metallic tack as the reference, indicated that suture and glue both carried a lower risk of recurrence with pooled risk ratios (RR) of 0.29 (95% CI 0.00, 18.81) and 0.29 (0.07, 1.30), respectively. For overall complications, absorbable tack had lower risk (0.63, 95% CI: 0.02, 16.13). However, none of these estimates reached statistical significance. So, this network meta-analysis suggests that glue and absorbable tack might be best in lowering recurrence risk and complications. However, a large scale RCT is still needed to confirm these results.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSurgeon. Vol.17, No.4 (2019), 215-224en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.surge.2018.09.002en_US
dc.identifier.issn1479666Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85055428723en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/51514
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85055428723&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleMesh fixation technique in totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair – A network meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85055428723&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections