Publication:
Comparison of accuracy of alginate impression and intraoral scanner in model with and without orthodontic brackets

dc.contributor.authorPitchapa Phudphongen_US
dc.contributor.authorPokpong Amornviten_US
dc.contributor.authorNattapong Sirintawaten_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University, Faculty of Dentistryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T08:18:46Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T08:18:46Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-01en_US
dc.description.abstractSurgical splints are widely used in orthognathic surgery. The fitting of a surgical splint affects the success of the surgery. Stereolithography (STL), the method used to achieve accurate and reliable input files, is important for the manufacturing process of the surgical splint. Nowadays, data acquisition can be performed with the aid of an intraoral scanner (IOS) or impression materials. This in vitro study aimed to compare the trueness and precision of IOS (TRIOS3®, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) and alginate impression (Kromopan®, Lascod, Florence, Italy) in a full-arch dental model with/without orthodontic brackets. Custom complete arch models were fabricated with a refractive index similar to that of tooth structure. A TRIOS3® intraoral scanner (3Shape, Copenhagen, Den-mark) and an alginate impression were used to duplicate the custom model without orthodontic brackets for complete arch scenarios (both upper and lower arches), n = 5. Subsequently, orthodontic brackets (Ormco®, Glendora, CA, USA) were attached to the custom model and the TRIOS® intraoral scanner and alginate impression were used again. Analysis was performed using 3-dimensional (3D) metrology software (GOM inspect®, GOM GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany) to measure surface deviations between the STL files from the custom model to evaluate and compare their trueness and precision. All data were entered into Microsoft Excel and then transferred to SPSS (Statisti-cal Package for the Social Sciences). The average surface deviations were compared between the TRIOS3® intraoral scanner and the alginate impression using a repeated measures ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) with adjustment for multiple comparisons using Bonferroni’s correction. There were no significant differences in trueness and precision between TRIOS3® and alginate impression in full arch models with and without orthodontic brackets. Moreover, the accuracy of all groups was less than 100 microns, which was acceptable. Further in vivo studies are required to confirm these results.en_US
dc.identifier.citationApplied Sciences (Switzerland). Vol.11, No.13 (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app11136037en_US
dc.identifier.issn20763417en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85109344476en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/76519
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85109344476&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectChemical Engineeringen_US
dc.subjectComputer Scienceen_US
dc.subjectEngineeringen_US
dc.subjectMaterials Scienceen_US
dc.subjectPhysics and Astronomyen_US
dc.titleComparison of accuracy of alginate impression and intraoral scanner in model with and without orthodontic bracketsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85109344476&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections