Publication:
Focal fibrosis and diffuse fibrosis are predictors of reversed left ventricular remodeling in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy

dc.contributor.authorTeerapat Yingchoncharoenen_US
dc.contributor.authorChristine Jellisen_US
dc.contributor.authorZoran B. Popovicen_US
dc.contributor.authorLu Wangen_US
dc.contributor.authorNeville Gaien_US
dc.contributor.authorWayne C. Levyen_US
dc.contributor.authorW. H.Wilson Tangen_US
dc.contributor.authorScott Flammen_US
dc.contributor.authorDeborah H. Kwonen_US
dc.contributor.otherCleveland Clinic Foundationen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T03:21:27Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T08:02:01Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T03:21:27Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T08:02:01Z
dc.date.issued2016-10-15en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2016 Background Prognostic value of myocardial fibrosis in patients with non-ischemic idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is not well-defined. We sought to assess the association of focal and diffuse myocardial fibrosis with left ventricular reversed remodeling (LVRR). Methods Patients with DCM who underwent cardiac MRI with baseline and subsequent follow-up echocardiography were included in the study. Post-contrast T1 times were corrected for renal function, body size, gadolinium dose and time after Gadolinium injection. Patients were followed over a median time of 29 months to evaluate changes of left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV). A Linear Mixed Model was used to assess the relationship between the LVESV during follow-up, corrected post-T1 value delayed hyperenhancement (DHE), and modified Seattle Heart Failure Score (SHFS). Results A total of 103 patients (mean age 51 ± 15 years, 61% male) were evaluated. The mean LVEF was 33 ± 11%, LVESVi 62 ± 39 ml/m2, and T1 time 416 ± 98. DHE was identified in 45 patients (44%). Patients with focal DHE (n = 45) had higher LVESVi at baseline and during follow-up (p = 0.024). Post T1 value > 450 was an independent predictor of LVRR at the follow-up (Δ = 24.6 ml/m2SE 14.6 ml/2, p = 0.0480) in patients despite the presence of DHE, even after adjusting for their SHFS. Conclusion While DCM patients with focal DHE demonstrated greater adverse LV remodeling than those without focal fibrosis, diffuse fibrosis independently predicts LVRR in DCM patients in patients despite the presence of focal fibrosis.en_US
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Cardiology. Vol.221, (2016), 498-504en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.095en_US
dc.identifier.issn18741754en_US
dc.identifier.issn01675273en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84978121184en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/41087
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84978121184&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleFocal fibrosis and diffuse fibrosis are predictors of reversed left ventricular remodeling in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84978121184&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections