Publication:
Scintigraphic detection of splenosis and accessory spleen by using Tc-99m labelled denatured red blood cells

dc.contributor.authorApichaya Claimonen_US
dc.contributor.authorNapaporn Tojindaen_US
dc.contributor.authorNinmanee Taweewatanasoponen_US
dc.contributor.authorPornphit Boonkhonen_US
dc.contributor.authorBoontham Amornkitticharoenen_US
dc.contributor.authorSirilak Wiriyaakradechaen_US
dc.contributor.authorShanigarn Thiraviten_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T10:22:02Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T10:22:02Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2019 Siriraj Medical Journal. Objective: To evaluate the usefulness of Tc-99m-labelled denatured red blood cell scintigraphy (DRBCS) in the detection of splenosis and accessory spleen. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed 7 patients who were suspected of splenosis and accessory spleen during 2007-2014. Six patients had undergone total splenectomy before the DRBCS study. Multi-planar, SPECT and SPECT/CT images of DRBCS were reviewed by visual analysis. Image findings were correlated with other imaging modalities and clinical presentations at follow-up. Results: DRBCSs were positive in 6 patients; 5 splenosis and 1 accessory spleen. A single lesion was detected in each patient. Locations were in splenic bed (5 patients) and in pelvic cavity (1 patient). Mean lesion size was 3.7 + 2.4 cm. SPECT or SPECT/CT imaging could eliminate false-negative results in 2 patients. Lesion uptake intensity in 4 patients was higher than in the liver. Two patients had subsequently undergone resection of the lesions and pathological examinations confirmed the diagnosis of splenosis and accessory spleen. Sensitivity of DRBCS was comparable with other imaging modalities. However, DRBCS was more specific for the splenic tissue. Conclusion: DRBCS is useful for the detection of splenosis and the accessory spleen. Detection sensitivity of DRBCS is better than ultrasonography(US). DRBCS is more specific to the splenic tissue, compared with US and CT. Furthermore, SPECT/CT imaging increases sensitivity, lesion localization and characterization. Clinical impact of DRBCS is apparent including pre-surgical localization, elimination of additional follow-up imaging and invasive procedure.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSiriraj Medical Journal. Vol.71, No.2 (2019), 143-149en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.33192/Smj.2019.22en_US
dc.identifier.issn22288082en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85064455370en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/52120
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85064455370&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleScintigraphic detection of splenosis and accessory spleen by using Tc-99m labelled denatured red blood cellsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85064455370&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections