Publication: Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy for severe pelvic endometriosis
dc.contributor.author | Amphan Chalermchockchareonkit | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Putthawan Tekasakul | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Pongsakdi Chaisilwattana | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Korakot Sirimai | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Noraziana Wahab | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | International Islamic University Malaysia | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-11T05:19:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-06-11T05:19:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-01-01 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To compare the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) versus abdominal hysterectomy (AH) in patients with severe pelvic endometriosis. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing hysterectomy for endometriosis was conducted between January 2002 and December 2007. A total of 503 patients had severe pelvic endometriosis; of these, 115 patients underwent LH and 388 patients underwent AH. Surgical outcomes-including operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and need for blood transfusion-were analyzed and compared between the 2 treatment groups. Results: Operative time was significantly longer for LH than for AH (185.1 ± 48.7 minutes and 139.9 ± 52.4 minutes, respectively; P < 0.001). However, estimated volume of blood loss, length of hospital stay, and complication rates were significantly less for patients in the LH group than for those in the AH group (302.6 ± 255.1 mL versus 760.9 ± 633.2 mL [P < 0.001]; 3.5 ± 1.1 days versus 6.4 ± 3.0 days [P < 0.001]; and 18.3% versus 49.0% [P < 0.001], respectively). Conclusion: Compared with AH, LH was associated with fewer complications. LH should, therefore, be the preferred surgical option for women with severe pelvic endometriosis who require a hysterectomy. © 2011 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Vol.116, No.2 (2012), 109-111 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.09.022 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 18793479 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 00207292 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-84355166519 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/15071 | |
dc.rights | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | en_US |
dc.source.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84355166519&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.subject | Medicine | en_US |
dc.title | Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy for severe pelvic endometriosis | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84355166519&origin=inward | en_US |