Publication: International consensus statement on robotic hepatectomy surgery in 2018
Issued Date
2019-03-28
Resource Type
ISSN
22192840
10079327
10079327
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85063673983
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
World Journal of Gastroenterology. Vol.25, No.12 (2019), 1432-1444
Suggested Citation
Rong Liu, Go Wakabayashi, Hong Jin Kim, Gi Hong Choi, Anusak Yiengpruksawan, Yuman Fong, Jin He, Ugo Boggi, Roberto I. Troisi, Mikhail Efanov, Daniel Azoulay, Daniel Azoulay, Fabrizio Panaro, Patrick Pessaux, Xiao Ying Wang, Jia Fan, Ji Ye Zhu, Shao Geng Zhang, Chuan Dong Sun, Zheng Wu, Kai Shan Tao, Ke Hu Yang, Xiao Ping Chen International consensus statement on robotic hepatectomy surgery in 2018. World Journal of Gastroenterology. Vol.25, No.12 (2019), 1432-1444. doi:10.3748/wjg.v25.i12.1432 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/51786
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
International consensus statement on robotic hepatectomy surgery in 2018
Author(s)
Rong Liu
Go Wakabayashi
Hong Jin Kim
Gi Hong Choi
Anusak Yiengpruksawan
Yuman Fong
Jin He
Ugo Boggi
Roberto I. Troisi
Mikhail Efanov
Daniel Azoulay
Daniel Azoulay
Fabrizio Panaro
Patrick Pessaux
Xiao Ying Wang
Jia Fan
Ji Ye Zhu
Shao Geng Zhang
Chuan Dong Sun
Zheng Wu
Kai Shan Tao
Ke Hu Yang
Xiao Ping Chen
Go Wakabayashi
Hong Jin Kim
Gi Hong Choi
Anusak Yiengpruksawan
Yuman Fong
Jin He
Ugo Boggi
Roberto I. Troisi
Mikhail Efanov
Daniel Azoulay
Daniel Azoulay
Fabrizio Panaro
Patrick Pessaux
Xiao Ying Wang
Jia Fan
Ji Ye Zhu
Shao Geng Zhang
Chuan Dong Sun
Zheng Wu
Kai Shan Tao
Ke Hu Yang
Xiao Ping Chen
Other Contributor(s)
Peking University People's Hospital
Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Pisana
302 Hospital of People's Liberation Army
General Hospital of People's Liberation Army
Xijing Hospital
CHU Montpellier
Qingdao University
Lanzhou University
Yeungnam University Medical Center
Hopital Civil
Xi'an Jiaotong University
Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
Yonsei University
Hopital Paul-Brousse
Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
Fudan University
City of Hope National Med Center
The Johns Hopkins Hospital
Tongji Medical College
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center
Ageo Central General Hospital
Tel Hashomer Hospital
Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Pisana
302 Hospital of People's Liberation Army
General Hospital of People's Liberation Army
Xijing Hospital
CHU Montpellier
Qingdao University
Lanzhou University
Yeungnam University Medical Center
Hopital Civil
Xi'an Jiaotong University
Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
Yonsei University
Hopital Paul-Brousse
Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
Fudan University
City of Hope National Med Center
The Johns Hopkins Hospital
Tongji Medical College
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center
Ageo Central General Hospital
Tel Hashomer Hospital
Abstract
© The Author(s) 2019. The robotic surgical system has been applied in liver surgery. However, controversies concerns exist regarding a variety of factors including the safety, feasibility, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery. To promote the development of robotic hepatectomy, this study aimed to evaluate the current status of robotic hepatectomy and provide sixty experts' consensus and recommendations to promote its development. Based on the World Health Organization Handbook for Guideline Development, a Consensus Steering Group and a Consensus Development Group were established to determine the topics, prepare evidence-based documents, and generate recommendations. The GRADE Grid method and Delphi vote were used to formulate the recommendations. A total of 22 topics were prepared analyzed and widely discussed during the 4 meetings. Based on the published articles and expert panel opinion, 7 recommendations were generated by the GRADE method using an evidence-based method, which focused on the safety, feasibility, indication, techniques and cost-effectiveness of hepatectomy. Given that the current evidences were low to very low as evaluated by the GRADE method, further randomized-controlled trials are needed in the future to validate these recommendations.