Publication: Infant loss during and after male replacement in gibbons
Issued Date
2019-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
10982345
02752565
02752565
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85071111664
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
American Journal of Primatology. Vol.81, No.8 (2019)
Suggested Citation
Chang Yong Ma, Warren Y. Brockelman, Lydia E.O. Light, Thad Q. Bartlett, Peng Fei Fan Infant loss during and after male replacement in gibbons. American Journal of Primatology. Vol.81, No.8 (2019). doi:10.1002/ajp.23036 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/49922
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Infant loss during and after male replacement in gibbons
Abstract
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. According to the sexual selection hypothesis, infanticide during resident male replacement is an adaptive strategy that has evolved because the killing of unweaned offspring sired by previous males shortens the inter-birth intervals of the mothers whose infants are targeted and thereby increases the reproductive fitness of the perpetrator. To test this hypothesis, we describe previously unreported cases of primary male replacement for two gibbon species (Hylobates lar and Nomascus nasutus), and review all other reported cases of primary male replacement in gibbons. Overall, infants were present in nearly half of all cases (16/33, 48%) and of the 18 infants present during replacement, 50% (N = 9) disappeared within 2 months of the event. In four of the five cases where there was sufficient demographic information to identify the likely sire of the subsequent offspring of females that lost infants, the new male was believed to be the sire. Infants were also less likely to die or disappear if the new male and original resident male were possible kin. However, there was no significant difference in the age of infants between those that died or disappeared following replacement and those that survived to weaning (p =.630). Our review of takeover-related infant loss in gibbons confirms that periods of male instability are risky for unweaned infants and that replacing males benefit from infant loss. Nevertheless, variability in the context of infant loss and difficulties related to data collection in the field make it difficult to test competing hypotheses concerning the mechanisms and functions of infanticide in the small apes.