Publication:
Does overcorrection cause any negative effect on pediatric missed Monteggia lesion?

dc.contributor.authorPiyanuch Musikacharten_US
dc.contributor.authorNanthaya Tisavipaten_US
dc.contributor.authorPerajit Eamsobhanaen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-05T05:47:54Z
dc.date.available2020-05-05T05:47:54Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020, Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature. Purposes: To evaluate the outcome of different types of ulna osteotomy in missed Monteggia fracture with a particular interest in anatomical correction and overcorrection techniques. The outcome between the two groups were compared on aspects of (1) clinical outcome (2) radiologic outcome. Methods: Twenty-one patients with type 1 missed Monteggia fracture who underwent surgery between January 2005–2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the degrees of correction: group 1 anatomical correction (no ulnar dorsal angulation) and group 2 overcorrection (degrees of ulnar dorsal angulation ≥ 10°). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Kim elbow performance score. Radiologic outcomes were categorized into four groups with regard to the radial head: excellent (complete reduction), good (slight subluxation), fair (moderate subluxation), and poor (dislocation). Results: Eleven patients with anatomical ulna osteotomy and ten patients with overcorrection ulnar osteotomy were enrolled with a mean age of 7.95 (5–12) years at the time of operation. The mean duration from injury to surgery was 27.05 (3–120) months, and the mean period of follow-up was 29.90 ± 22.37 (12–84) months. The average angle of total correction measured in group 1 was 6.09° (3°–9°) and 28.37° (12°–40°), in group 2. Fair-to-poor radiological outcomes at the last follow-up were more frequently observed in overcorrection group (40% vs. 0%) (p = 0.035) as well as clinical outcome (20% vs. 0%) (p = 0.214). Among the patients in group 2, posterior dislocation was diagnosed in two patients at 18 months and 2 months after surgery. Conclusion: The postoperative result of overcorrection ulna osteotomy showed significant inferiority in radiologic outcome compared to anatomical correction. Overcorrection of ulna osteotomy could be associated with posterior dislocation of radial head.en_US
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology. (2020)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00590-020-02660-zen_US
dc.identifier.issn14321068en_US
dc.identifier.issn16338065en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85082325744en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/54646
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85082325744&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleDoes overcorrection cause any negative effect on pediatric missed Monteggia lesion?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85082325744&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections