Publication:
Angioedema quality of life questionnaire (AE-QoL)-interpretability and sensitivity to change

dc.contributor.authorKanokvalai Kulthananen_US
dc.contributor.authorLeena Chularojanamontrien_US
dc.contributor.authorChuda Rujitharanawongen_US
dc.contributor.authorPuncharas Weerasubpongen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarcus Maureren_US
dc.contributor.authorKarsten Welleren_US
dc.contributor.otherCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlinen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T09:25:38Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T09:25:38Z
dc.date.issued2019-10-26en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2019 The Author(s). Background: The Angioedema Quality of Life (AE-QoL) is the first patient reported outcome measure developed for the assessment of quality of life (QoL) impairment in patients with recurrent angioedema (RAE). This study aimed to evaluate the clinimetric properties of the AE-QoL in Thai patients and to establish categories of QoL impairment assessed by the AE-QoL. Methods: The validated Thai version of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Patient Global Assessment of Quality of Life (PGA-QoL) were used to comparatively evaluate the Thai version of AE-QoL. Spearman correlations between the Thai AE-QoL and two other standard measurements (DLQI and PGA-QoL) were investigated to determine convergent validity. The Thai DLQI and PGA-QoL were used to categorize patients according to their QoL. Known-group validity of the Thai AE-QoL was later analyzed. The reliability of the Thai AE-QoL was investigated using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation. Three different approaches including the distribution method, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and the anchor based-method were used for the interpretability. Results: A total of 86 patients with RAE with a median age of 38.0 ± 15.1 years (range 18-76) were enrolled. Of those, 76 patients (88%) had RAE with concomitant wheals, and 10 patients (11.6%) had RAE only. The AE-QoL assessed RAE-mediated QoL impairment with high convergent validity and known-groups validity, high internal consistency and test-retest reliability, and good sensitivity to change. Although the AE-QoL did not differentiate between patients with moderate and large effect as measured by PGA-QoL or DLQI in this study, AE-QoL total values of 0-23, 24 to 38, and ≥ 39 could define patients with "no effect", "small effect", and "moderate to large effect" of RAE on their QoL, respectively. Conclusions: This study supports the validity and reliability of the Thai version of the AE-QoL, which is a very different language from the original version. Categories allow to classify the effect of RAE on patients' QoL as "none", "small", and "moderate to large". Further studies are needed to confirm the applicability of AE-QoL in other Asian populations".en_US
dc.identifier.citationHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes. Vol.17, No.1 (2019)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12955-019-1229-3en_US
dc.identifier.issn14777525en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85074153239en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/51357
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85074153239&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleAngioedema quality of life questionnaire (AE-QoL)-interpretability and sensitivity to changeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85074153239&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections