Publication:
Comparison of adverse events following injection of original or generic docetaxel for the treatment of breast cancer

dc.contributor.authorNao Tagawaen_US
dc.contributor.authorErika Sugiyamaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMasataka Tajimaen_US
dc.contributor.authorYasutsuna Sasakien_US
dc.contributor.authorSeigo Nakamuraen_US
dc.contributor.authorHiromi Okuyamaen_US
dc.contributor.authorHisanori Shimizuen_US
dc.contributor.authorVilasinee Hirunpanich Satoen_US
dc.contributor.authorTadanori Sasakien_US
dc.contributor.authorHitoshi Satoen_US
dc.contributor.otherShowa Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-21T06:41:15Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T08:02:45Z
dc.date.available2018-12-21T06:41:15Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T08:02:45Z
dc.date.issued2017-10-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2017, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany. Purpose: The approval of injectable generic drugs does not require bioequivalence testing. However, although generic products contain the same level of the active compound, the levels and types of additives present can differ from those used in the original product. Since docetaxel is highly lipophilic, polysorbate 80 (PS80), polyethylene glycol (PEG), and ethyl alcohol are employed to solubilize this anticancer agent. This retrospective study compared the safety of five docetaxel products (Taxotere®, Docetaxel Hospira, Docetaxel Sandoz, Docetaxel Sawai, and Docetaxel EE). Methods: The incidence and severity of adverse events were analyzed using the medical records of operable breast cancer patients (n = 363) treated with docetaxel (75 mg/m2) in Showa University Hospital, Japan, from Jan 2013 to Mar 2016. Toxicities were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Results: Significant product-related differences were observed in the following non-hematological adverse events: injection site reaction (P = 0.0012), hand-foot syndrome (≥grade 3) (P = 0.0003), and oral mucositis (≥grade 3) (P = 0.0080). Multivariate logistic regression analyses of the associations between these adverse events and the total additive administered (g/m2) identified significant negative effects of PS80 and ethyl alcohol. Conclusions: Injectable docetaxel products had different adverse event profiles, which showed negative associations with the amounts of PS80 and ethyl alcohol present. This finding indicated that there might be additive-related pharmacokinetic and physiochemical differences among these products, suggesting a need for further pre- or post-approval testing of injectable generic products containing noticeable different levels of additives.en_US
dc.identifier.citationCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology. Vol.80, No.4 (2017), 841-849en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00280-017-3425-3en_US
dc.identifier.issn14320843en_US
dc.identifier.issn03445704en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85028751900en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/41768
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85028751900&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.titleComparison of adverse events following injection of original or generic docetaxel for the treatment of breast canceren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85028751900&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections