Publication:
Effect of intellivent‐asv versus conventional ventilation on ventilation intensity in patients with covid‐19 ards— an observational study

dc.contributor.authorLaura A. Buiteman‐kruizingaen_US
dc.contributor.authorHassan E. Mkadmien_US
dc.contributor.authorAry Serpa Netoen_US
dc.contributor.authorMatthijs D. Kruizingaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMichela Bottaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarcus J. Schultzen_US
dc.contributor.authorFrederique Paulusen_US
dc.contributor.authorPim L.J. van der Heidenen_US
dc.contributor.otherHogeschool van Amsterdam, University of Applied Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.otherJuliana Children's Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherMonash Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherHospital Israelita Albert Einsteinen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNuffield Department of Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherAmsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdamen_US
dc.contributor.otherReinier de Graaf Hospital - SSDZen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T09:07:47Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T09:07:47Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-01en_US
dc.description.abstractDriving pressure (ΔP) and mechanical power (MP) are associated with outcomes in critically ill patients, irrespective of the presence of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). INTELLiVENT‐ASV, a fully automated ventilatory mode, controls the settings that affect ΔP and MP. This study compared the intensity of ventilation (ΔP and MP) with INTELLiVENT‐ASV versus conventional ventilation in a cohort of COVID‐19 ARDS patients in two intensive care units in the Netherlands. The coprimary endpoints were ΔP and MP before and after converting from conventional ventilation to INTELLiVENT‐ASV. Compared to conventional ventilation, INTELLiVENT‐ASV delivered ventilation with a lower ΔP and less MP. With conventional ventilation, ΔP was 13 cmH2O, and MP was 21.5 and 24.8 J/min, whereas with INTELLiVENT‐ASV, ΔP was 11 and 10 cmH2O (mean difference –2 cm H2O (95 %CI –2.5 to –1.2 cm H2O), p < 0.001) and MP was 18.8 and 17.5 J/min (mean difference –7.3 J/Min (95% CI –8.8 to –5.8 J/min), p < 0.001). Conversion from conventional ventilation to INTELLiVENT‐ASV resulted in a lower intensity of ventilation. These findings may favor the use of INTELLiVENT‐ASV in COVID‐19 ARDS patients, but future studies remain needed to see if the reduction in the intensity of ventilation translates into clinical benefits.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Medicine. Vol.10, No.22 (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jcm10225409en_US
dc.identifier.issn20770383en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85119347780en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/77704
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85119347780&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleEffect of intellivent‐asv versus conventional ventilation on ventilation intensity in patients with covid‐19 ards— an observational studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85119347780&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections