Publication:
Accuracy of computer-guided implantation in the placement of one-piece ceramic dental implants in the anterior region: A prospective clinical study

dc.contributor.authorNopparat Suksoden_US
dc.contributor.authorChatchai Kunavisaruten_US
dc.contributor.authorJira Kitisubkanchanaen_US
dc.contributor.otherThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hillen_US
dc.contributor.otherOsaka Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-05T03:39:46Z
dc.date.available2020-10-05T03:39:46Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-01en_US
dc.description.abstractCopyright: © 2020 Suksod et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Purpose Placement of one-piece ceramic dental implants requires precision, which can be enhanced by using a computer-guided system. This prospective clinical study examines the accuracy of partially guided implantation in the placement of one-piece ceramic implants in the anterior region. Materials and methods One-piece ceramic dental implants were placed in 20 patients who were missing a central or lateral incisor. Partially guided dental implant placements were performed in all cases. The deviations in the implant positions were analyzed by superimposing post-operative cone beam computed tomography images over pre-operative treatment planning images. The results were reported as deviations (mean ± standard deviation) for three aspects (3D offset, mesio-distal, labio-lingual, and apico-coronal) and in three dimensions (the angle, coronal, and apical parts). Results Implants were successfully placed in 20 patients. The mean angular deviation was 4.23 ±1.84∘, whereas the mean coronal 3D offset was 0.98±0.48 mm, and the mean apical 3D offset was 1.57±0.46 mm. Conclusions A prospective clinical study involving 20 patients was conducted to measure the accuracy of computer-guided implantation of one-piece ceramic dental implants. Accuracy was determined by comparing the planned implant position to the actual position. Greater accuracy can be expected at the coronal part than at the apical part. The coronal 3D offset was found to be the most accurate.en_US
dc.format.mimetypevideo/youtube
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE. Vol.15, No.9 September (2020)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0237229en_US
dc.identifier.issn19326203en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85091052105en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/58897
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85091052105&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.titleAccuracy of computer-guided implantation in the placement of one-piece ceramic dental implants in the anterior region: A prospective clinical studyen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mediaObject.contentUrlhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUTRD1AXXAk
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85091052105&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections