Publication:
Protein profiling as a useful diagnostic tool to classify patients with acute myeloid leukemia of different cytogenetic abnormalities

dc.contributor.authorNarongrit Sritanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorChantragan Srisomsapen_US
dc.contributor.authorDaranee Chokchaichamnankiten_US
dc.contributor.authorJisnuson Svastien_US
dc.contributor.authorOrathai Promsuwichaen_US
dc.contributor.authorChirayu Auewarakulen_US
dc.contributor.otherChulabhorn Research Instituteen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherChulabhorn Royal Academyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-28T06:06:53Z
dc.date.available2019-08-28T06:06:53Z
dc.date.issued2018-06-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018, Medical Association of Thailand. All rights reserved. Background: Several nonrandom chromosomal abnormalities have been identified in acute myeloid leukemia [AML] and are strong determinants of prognostic outcome and therapeutic response. Because clinical outcomes of AML patients with cytogenetic aberrations differ considerably, we hypothesized that their proteomes may also differ, particularly in their expression patterns and protein interaction pathways. Objective: To study the protein profiling that is related to different karyotypes ofAML patients. Materials and Methods: We performed proteomic analysis using 20 AML samples with various cytogenetic abnormalities including t(8;21) (n = 4), t(15;17) (n = 3), inv(16) (n = 4), trisomy 8 (n = 3), trisomy 11 (n = 3) and trisomy 21 (n = 3). Proteins from bone marrow cells were separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and the protein profiles were compared among the samples. Results: Favorable karyotypes, such as t(8;21), t(15;17) and inv(16), showed similar protein profiles within their own groups but differed from all other subgroups, whereas the trisomy group had similar protein profiles only within the same French-American-British morphological classification. As previously reported, some identified proteins by LC/MS/MS spectrometer, including transgelin-2, were also expressed in leukemic cells from patients or leukemia cell lines. Conclusion: Unique proteomic patterns were identified in some AML subgroups. AML patients may be further sub-classified using protein profiles generated by this approach in combination with the current standard diagnostic methods.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.101, No.6 (2018), S29-S35en_US
dc.identifier.issn01252208en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85064190017en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/46630
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85064190017&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleProtein profiling as a useful diagnostic tool to classify patients with acute myeloid leukemia of different cytogenetic abnormalitiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85064190017&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections