Publication:
Prognostic models of diabetic microvascular complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorSigit Ari Saputroen_US
dc.contributor.authorOraluck Pattanaprateepen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnuchate Pattanateepaponen_US
dc.contributor.authorSwekshya Karmacharyaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAmmarin Thakkinstianen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversitas Airlanggaen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T09:00:46Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T09:00:46Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Many prognostic models of diabetic microvascular complications have been developed, but their performances still varies. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarise the performances of the existing models. Methods: Prognostic models of diabetic microvascular complications were retrieved from PubMed and Scopus up to 31 December 2020. Studies were selected, if they developed or internally/externally validated models of any microvascular complication in type 2 diabetes (T2D). Results: In total, 71 studies were eligible, of which 32, 30 and 18 studies initially developed prognostic model for diabetic retinopathy (DR), chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end stage renal disease (ESRD) with the number of derived equations of 84, 96 and 51, respectively. Most models were derived-phases, some were internal and external validations. Common predictors were age, sex, HbA1c, diabetic duration, SBP and BMI. Traditional statistical models (i.e. Cox and logit regression) were mostly applied, otherwise machine learning. In cohorts, the discriminative performance in derived-logit was pooled with C statistics of 0.82 (0.73‑0.92) for DR and 0.78 (0.74‑0.83) for CKD. Pooled Cox regression yielded 0.75 (0.74‑0.77), 0.78 (0.74‑0.82) and 0.87 (0.84‑0.89) for DR, CKD and ESRD, respectively. External validation performances were sufficiently pooled with 0.81 (0.78‑0.83), 0.75 (0.67‑0.84) and 0.87 (0.85‑0.88) for DR, CKD and ESRD, respectively. Conclusions: Several prognostic models were developed, but less were externally validated. A few studies derived the models by using appropriate methods and were satisfactory reported. More external validations and impact analyses are required before applying these models in clinical practice. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42018105287.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSystematic Reviews. Vol.10, No.1 (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13643-021-01841-zen_US
dc.identifier.issn20464053en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85118394552en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/77490
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85118394552&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titlePrognostic models of diabetic microvascular complications: a systematic review and meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85118394552&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections