Publication:
Secondary Raised Intracranial Pressure After Cranial Vault Remodeling for Isolated Sagittal Craniosynostosis

dc.contributor.authorMark H. Mooreen_US
dc.contributor.authorSarut Chaisrisawadisuken_US
dc.contributor.authorVani Prasaden_US
dc.contributor.authorStephen Santoreneosen_US
dc.contributor.authorCindy J. Molloyen_US
dc.contributor.otherSiriraj Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherWomen's and Children's Hospital Adelaideen_US
dc.contributor.otherCleft and Craniofacialen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T09:07:09Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T09:07:09Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-01en_US
dc.description.abstractThe management of sagittal craniosynostosis has evolved over the decades as teams seek to refine their surgical approaches to idealize head shape with the least possible morbidity. Here, the authors identify the incidence of raised intracranial pressure (ICP) and its risk factors, requiring secondary surgical intervention after cranial vault remodeling (CVR) procedure at a single tertiary referral craniofacial unit. A retrospective case-control study was performed on the patients with isolated non-syndromic sagittal craniosynostosis. All patients who underwent CVR in our unit and had a minimum of 1.5years follow-up were included. One hundred and eighty-four patients (134 male and 50 female) who underwent primary CVR surgery for isolated sagittal craniosynostosis were included. Thirteen patients (7.07%) had clinical evidence of late raised ICP resulting in repeat CVR procedures. Higher incidence of raised ICP in patients who had primary surgery before 6months than after or at 6months of age (P=0.001). There were 23.5%, 5.6%, 3.2%, and 1.9% of secondary raised ICP patients who underwent the primary surgery between 1999-2004, 2005-2010, 2011-2015 and 2016-2018, respectively (P=0.024). The risk of secondary raised ICP was higher in patients with isolated sagittal craniosynostosis whose primary surgery occurred before the age of 6months (two times more likely). More extensive CVR can be performed safely in sagittal synostosis with promising outcomes. The late presentation with raised ICP reinforces the importance of long-term multidisciplinary protocol-based follow-up.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Craniofacial Surgery. Vol.32, No.8 (2021), 2651-2655en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0000000000007886en_US
dc.identifier.issn15363732en_US
dc.identifier.issn10492275en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85121477044en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/77680
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85121477044&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleSecondary Raised Intracranial Pressure After Cranial Vault Remodeling for Isolated Sagittal Craniosynostosisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85121477044&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections