Publication:
Diaphragmatic parameters by ultrasonography for predicting weaning outcomes

dc.contributor.authorPongdhep Theerawiten_US
dc.contributor.authorDararat Eksombatchaien_US
dc.contributor.authorYuda Sutherasanen_US
dc.contributor.authorThitiporn Suwatanapongcheden_US
dc.contributor.authorCharn Kiatboonsrien_US
dc.contributor.authorSumalee Kiatboonsrien_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T11:35:51Z
dc.date.available2019-08-23T11:35:51Z
dc.date.issued2018-11-23en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018 The Author(s). Background: Diaphragmatic dysfunction remains the main cause of weaning difficulty or failure. Ultrasonographic measurement of diaphragmatic function can be used to predict the outcomes of weaning from mechanical ventilation. Our primary objective was to investigate the performance of various sonographic parameters of diaphragmatic function for predicting the success of weaning from mechanical ventilation. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 68 adult patients requiring mechanical ventilation who were admitted to the intensive care unit from June 2013 to November 2013. The diaphragmatic inspiratory excursion, time to peak inspiratory amplitude of the diaphragm (TPIA dia ), diaphragmatic thickness (DT), DT difference (DTD), and diaphragm thickening fraction (TFdi) were determined by bedside ultrasonography performed at the end of a spontaneous breathing trial. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used for analysis. Results: In total, 62 patients were analyzed. The mean TPIA dia was significantly higher in the weaning success group (right, 1.27 ± 0.38 s; left, 1.14 ± 0.37 s) than in the weaning failure group (right, 0.97 ± 0.43 s; left, 0.85 ± 0.39 s) (P < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of a TPIA dia of > 0.8 s in predicting weaning success were 92, 46, 89, and 56%, respectively. The diaphragmatic inspiratory excursion, DTD, and TFdi were associated with reintubation within 48 h. The P values were 0.047, 0.021, and 0.028, and the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.716, 0.805, and 0.784, respectively. Conclusion: Among diaphragmatic parameters, TPIA dia exhibits good performance in predicting the success of weaning from mechanical ventilation. This study demonstrated a trend toward successful use of TPIA dia rather than diaphragmatic inspiratory excursion as a predictor of weaning from mechanical ventilation.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBMC Pulmonary Medicine. Vol.18, No.1 (2018)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12890-018-0739-9en_US
dc.identifier.issn14712466en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85057100319en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/46181
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85057100319&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleDiaphragmatic parameters by ultrasonography for predicting weaning outcomesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85057100319&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections