Publication:
Comparison of treatment efficacy between 100% platelet-rich plasma and 100% serum eye drops in moderate-to-severe dry eye disease: a randomised controlled trial protocol

dc.contributor.authorPassara Jongkhajornpongen_US
dc.contributor.authorPawin Numthavajen_US
dc.contributor.authorThunyarat Anothaisintaweeen_US
dc.contributor.authorKaevalin Lekhanonten_US
dc.contributor.authorGareth Mckayen_US
dc.contributor.authorJohn Attiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAmmarin Thakkinstianen_US
dc.contributor.otherRamathibodi Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherSchool of Medicine and Public Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherQueen's University Belfasten_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T09:21:10Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T09:21:10Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-30en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Dry eye disease (DED) is a common eye problem. Although the disease is not fatal, it substantially reduces quality of life and creates a high economic burden, especially in patients with moderate-to-severe DED. Several biological tear substitutes (eg, autologous serum (AS), autologous platelet-rich plasma (APRP) and autologous platelet lysate) could effectively improve dry eyes. However, evidence on their comparative efficacy is controversial. This study aims to compare the efficacy of 100% APRP with 100% AS eye drops in patients with moderate-to-severe DED. Methods and analysis The study is a single-centre, double-blinded randomised, parallel, non-inferiority trial. One hundred and thirty patients with moderate-to-severe DED, aged 18-70 years will be recruited from outpatient clinic, Department of Ophthalmology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok from February 2021 to January 2023. Patients will be randomised to receive either 100% APRP or 100% AS eye drops (1:1 ratio) for 4 weeks. The primary outcomes are ocular surface disease index (OSDI) and ocular surface staining (OSS) evaluated using the Oxford scale. Secondary outcomes are fluorescein break-up time, Schirmer's I test, meibomian gland parameters and adverse events. Other measured outcomes include best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure and compliance. Ethics and dissemination The study protocol and any supplements used in conducting this trial have been approved by the Ethics Committee of Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University (MURA2020/1930). Informed consent will be obtained from all patients before study entry. Results will be presented in peer-reviewed journals and international conferences. Trial registration number NCT04683796.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open. Vol.11, No.6 (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048479en_US
dc.identifier.issn20446055en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85109047034en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/78119
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85109047034&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleComparison of treatment efficacy between 100% platelet-rich plasma and 100% serum eye drops in moderate-to-severe dry eye disease: a randomised controlled trial protocolen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85109047034&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections