Publication:
Inter-site validations of the Pixel-Wise method for cardiac T2* analysis in transfusion-dependent Thai thalassemia patients.

dc.contributor.authorPairash Saiviroonpornen_US
dc.contributor.authorVip Viprakasiten_US
dc.contributor.authorAdisak Maneesaien_US
dc.contributor.authorNoppadol Siritanaratkulen_US
dc.contributor.authorBunchoo Pongtanakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorJohn C. Wooden_US
dc.contributor.authorRungroj Krittayaphongen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-11T05:16:54Z
dc.date.available2018-06-11T05:16:54Z
dc.date.issued2012-02-01en_US
dc.description.abstractTo compare inter-site observer variability of the Pixel- Wise (PW) method for cardiac T2* analysis in thalassemia patients using the mono-exponential with a constant fitting (offset) model and to compare the cross-model variability of the offset model to the mono-exponential (typical) model. Eighty-eight cardiac T2* measurements were performed on 72 Thalassemia major patients. Both bright- and black-blood techniques were acquired and analyzed at both the reference (REF) and local (LOC) sites using the PW method by defined region of interest on the whole (at the REF site) and partial (at the LOC site) septum. The offset model was analyzed at the reference site while both the offset and typical models were performed at the local site. The inter-site variability of the T2* values were analyzed by independent observers blinded to the results. The T2* values from the REF-offset, LOC-offset and LOC-typical methods were statistically comparable on both scanning techniques. The inter-site variations of the offset model were about 5.2% and 4.4% on the bright- and black-blood techniques, respectively, which was about 1.7% higher than from the intra-site, but was still in a reasonable range compared to the conventional method of around 5.4%. The cross-model comparisons presented with 0.4 ms of bias and variation of about 6.9% and 4.7%, respectively, which is about 1.4% higher than from the intra-site. The observer variability on the PW method using the offset or typical model provided equivalent coefficient of variation on both scanning techniques, which was also comparable to the previous reports. The inter-site variability of the offset and cross models was also in a reasonable range, being less than 2% higher than the intra-site with bias of about 0.4 ms.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet. Vol.95 Suppl 2, (2012)en_US
dc.identifier.issn01252208en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84862287853en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/14988
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84862287853&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleInter-site validations of the Pixel-Wise method for cardiac T2* analysis in transfusion-dependent Thai thalassemia patients.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84862287853&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections