Publication:
Comparison of two tube-modification techniques in baerveldt glaucoma implantation in refractory glaucoma

dc.contributor.authorPurit Petpiroonen_US
dc.contributor.authorThanyathorn Vijittrakarnrungen_US
dc.contributor.authorWasu Supakontanasanen_US
dc.contributor.authorApichat Tantraworasinen_US
dc.contributor.authorYanin Suwanen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherChiang Mai Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-25T11:17:11Z
dc.date.available2020-08-25T11:17:11Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020 Petpiroon et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. Importance: To compare treatment outcomes among a stent group, ligature group and combined groupineyeswithrefractoryglaucoma. Background: Various techniques have been used intra-operatively to restrict the aqueous flow in Baerveldt glaucoma implantation. Design: Retrospective chart review. Participants: All glaucoma patients aged over 18-years old who had Baerveldt implantation in Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, between October 2011 and February 2018 were included for analysis. Methods: Retrospective interventional research was conducted. All glaucoma patients who underwent drainage device implantations were retrospectively reviewed from medical records and divided into three groups: stent group, ligature group, and combined group. The primary outcome was post-operative intraocular pressure (IOP) changes and BCVA (logMAR) change. The secondary outcome is treatment failure. Repeated measurements with mixed models and multi-level parametric survival model stratified by propensity score and eye side were used to compare the primary and secondary outcomes between stent group and ligature group. Main Outcome Measures: Treatment failure between two groups. Results: A total of 163 patients with a mean age of 57.11 ± 19.04 years, implanted with Baerveldt tube, were eligible. There were no significant differences between stent and ligature groups in terms of post-operative IOP changes [mean difference with 95% confidence interval = 0.53 (−0.49, +1.55) vs −0.02 (−0.84, +0.81); P = 0.411] and post-operative BCVA (logMAR) change (0.02 (−0.13, +0.18) vs –0.05 (−0.18, +0.07); P = 0.465). The hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval of treatment failure in ligature group were 2.57 (0.72–9.19) compared with the stent group. Conclusion: This study suggests a trend toward a better result in the stent group compared with the ligature group. Further research with a larger sample size and randomized control trial is warranted.en_US
dc.identifier.citationClinical Ophthalmology. Vol.14, (2020), 1689-1695en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/OPTH.S246905en_US
dc.identifier.issn11775483en_US
dc.identifier.issn11775467en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85086653407en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/58290
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85086653407&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleComparison of two tube-modification techniques in baerveldt glaucoma implantation in refractory glaucomaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85086653407&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections