Publication:
A Comparison of 3 Quantitative Radiographic Measurement Methods for Root Development Measurement in Regenerative Endodontic Procedures

dc.contributor.authorNithinun Sutamen_US
dc.contributor.authorJeeraphat Jantaraten_US
dc.contributor.authorLalida Ongchavaliten_US
dc.contributor.authorSupachai Sutimuntanakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorKenneth M. Hargreavesen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonioen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T11:00:37Z
dc.date.available2019-08-23T11:00:37Z
dc.date.issued2018-11-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018 American Association of Endodontists Introduction: The outcomes of an immature tooth with necrotic pulp treated with regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) were assessed clinically and radiographically. Root maturation is an important outcome of REPs, and several radiographic measurement methods have been used to measure this. The aim of this study was to compare radiographic measurement methods, measuring root maturation in immature teeth with necrotic pulp treated with REPs. Methods: Seventy-one radiographic images of REP cases were measured and compared using 3 radiographic measurement methods described by Bose et al (2009), Alobaid et al (2014), and Flake et al (2014). The intraclass correlation coefficient values were evaluated using the intra- and interobserver reliability test and the effect of the stage of root development. Results: The intra- and interobserver reliability for Alobaid et al's method and Flake et al's method were slightly higher than Bose et al's method as quantified by the intraclass correlation coefficient without a significant difference (P >.05). The stage of root development did not affect the reliability of the measurement methods. A high level of agreement was found among the 3 stages of root development for all 3 quantitative radiographic measurement methods. Conclusions: All 3 quantitative radiographic measurement methods exhibited high agreement regarding reliability. The stage of root development did not have an impact on the reliability of the measurement methods.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Endodontics. Vol.44, No.11 (2018), 1665-1670en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joen.2018.08.001en_US
dc.identifier.issn00992399en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85055502529en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/45694
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85055502529&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectDentistryen_US
dc.titleA Comparison of 3 Quantitative Radiographic Measurement Methods for Root Development Measurement in Regenerative Endodontic Proceduresen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85055502529&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections