Publication:
A fracture does not adversely affect bone mineral density responses after teriparatide treatment

dc.contributor.authorAasis Unnanuntanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorQuang V. Tonen_US
dc.contributor.authorJohn P. Kleimeyeren_US
dc.contributor.authorJoseph T. Nguyenen_US
dc.contributor.authorJoseph M. Laneen_US
dc.contributor.otherHospital for Special Surgery - New Yorken_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Internal Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherWeill Cornell Medical Collegeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-11T05:15:28Z
dc.date.available2018-06-11T05:15:28Z
dc.date.issued2012-03-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground Fracture leads to local and systemic catabolic physiologic changes. As teriparatide is an agent used to treat osteoporosis in patients with fragility fractures, it is unclear whether teriparatide treatment alters bone mineral density (BMD) and bone markers when given to patients with fractures. Questions/purposes We asked whether BMD and bone marker responses would be blunted in patients with fractures placed on teriparatide after fracture compared with patients without fractures on teriparatide. Patients and Methods We retrospectively collected data from 141 patients treated with teriparatide for osteoporosis. Seventy-seven patients received teriparatide after fractures (fracture group), whereas 64 were treated for other indications (nonfracture group).We determined BMD at the lumbar spine and at the proximal femur before and 12 and 24 months posttreatment. Bone markers (urine N-telopeptide [urine NTX], bone-specific alkaline phosphatase [BALP] ) were measured at baseline and 3, 12, and 24 months posttreatment. Results Mean lumbar spine and hip BMDs at last followup increased from baseline with no differences between groups to approximately 9% and 4% at 24 months, respectively. Both bone markers increased from baseline in the nonfracture group, peaking at 12 months. For the fracture group, only urine NTX increased at 3 and 12 months posttreatment. Although the peak levels of both bone markers in the nonfracture group were greater, there was no difference between the two groups. Conclusions Fracture does not have a negative effect on the BMD and bone marker responses to teriparatide treatment. Clinicians should anticipate comparable BMD responses when treating patients with teriparatide for osteoporotic fractures and for other indications. Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. © The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.citationClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. Vol.470, No.3 (2012), 927-936en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11999-011-2029-1en_US
dc.identifier.issn15281132en_US
dc.identifier.issn0009921Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84860400048en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/14935
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84860400048&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleA fracture does not adversely affect bone mineral density responses after teriparatide treatmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84860400048&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections