Publication:
Is admission to an SCI specialized rehabilitation facility associated with better functional outcomes? Analysis of data from the Thai Spinal Cord Injury Registry

dc.contributor.authorSintip Pattanakuharen_US
dc.contributor.authorPratchayapon Kammuang-lueen_US
dc.contributor.authorApichana Kovindhaen_US
dc.contributor.authorNapasakorn Komarataten_US
dc.contributor.authorRungarun Mahachaien_US
dc.contributor.authorChayaporn Chotiyarnwongen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherChiang Mai Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherRatchaburi Regional Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherSirindhorn National Medical Rehabilitation Centeren_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T09:38:50Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T09:38:50Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2019, International Spinal Cord Society. Study design: Prospective cohort study of the Thai Spinal Cord Injury Registry. Objective: To determine whether being admitted to a spinal cord injury (SCI) specialized rehabilitation facility (SSRF) is associated with better functional outcomes. Setting: Four rehabilitation facilities in Thailand; one a SSRF and the others non-SSRFs. Methods: Data from the one SSRF and three non-SSRFs were extracted from the Thai Spinal Cord Injury Registry. Multivariate regression analysis was used to exclude the effect of confounding factors and prove the independent association of SSRF admission with respect to Spinal Cord Independence Measurement (SCIM) at discharge. Results: Among the 234 new SCI inpatients enrolled, 167 persons (71%) had been admitted to the SSRF. The SSRF had a greater proportion of persons with AIS A, B, C tetraplegia and people with AIS D, whereas the non-SSRFs had a higher proportion of patients with AIS A, B or C paraplegia. Patients discharged from the SSRF demonstrated a greater SCIM score improvement than those from the non-SSRFs (24.1 vs 17.0; p = 0.003). By using multivariate regression analysis controlling for age, time from injury to rehabilitation, severity of injury and SCIM score on admission, SSRF admission was found to be an independent predictive factor of SCIM score improvement at discharge (p = 0.008). Conclusion: Admission to an SSRF is associated with better rehabilitation outcomes. This finding supports the importance of SSRF access to improve the functional outcome of patients with SCI.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSpinal Cord. Vol.57, No.8 (2019), 684-691en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41393-019-0267-3en_US
dc.identifier.issn14765624en_US
dc.identifier.issn13624393en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85062605451en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/51511
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85062605451&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleIs admission to an SCI specialized rehabilitation facility associated with better functional outcomes? Analysis of data from the Thai Spinal Cord Injury Registryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85062605451&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections