Publication:
Hydrothermal carbonization of unwanted biomass materials: Effect of process temperature and retention time on hydrochar and liquid fraction

dc.contributor.authorKamonwat Nakasonen_US
dc.contributor.authorBunyarit Panyapinyopolen_US
dc.contributor.authorVorapot Kanokkantapongen_US
dc.contributor.authorNawin Viriya-empikulen_US
dc.contributor.authorWasawat Kraithongen_US
dc.contributor.authorPrasert Pavasanten_US
dc.contributor.otherVidyasirimedhi Institute of Science and Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.otherChulalongkorn Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherKing Mongkut s University of Technology Thonburien_US
dc.contributor.otherThailand National Science and Technology Development Agencyen_US
dc.contributor.otherCenter of Excellence on Environmental Health and Toxicology (EHT)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T11:04:13Z
dc.date.available2019-08-23T11:04:13Z
dc.date.issued2018-10-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2017 Energy Institute Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) was applied to examine the feasibility in converting coconut husk (CH) and rice husk (RH) to renewable fuel resource and valuable dissolved organic chemicals. HTC was conducted with varying process temperature (140–200 °C) and retention time (1–4 h). CH was a better feedstock to produce hydrochar as solid fuel than RH because of its compositions was significantly different. An increase in process temperature from 140 to 200 °C resulted in a decrease in hydrochar yield of CH from 77.1 to 67.8%, and corresponding decreases in O/C and H/C from 0.6 and 1.4 to 0.4 and 1.2, respectively, and this was associated to dehydration and decarboxylation reactions. Fuel ratio and HHV were in the range of 0.66–0.86 and 20.7–23.9 MJ/kg, respectively. Liquid fractions (LF) from both RH and CH were found to be abundant in dissolved organic chemicals which were regarded as valuable intermediate chemicals, including furfural, furfuryl alcohol, hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), and low molecular-weight carboxylic acids (lactic acid, formic acid, acetic acid, levulinic acid, and propionic acid).en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Energy Institute. Vol.91, No.5 (2018), 786-796en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joei.2017.05.002en_US
dc.identifier.issn17460220en_US
dc.identifier.issn17439671en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85019564217en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/45768
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85019564217&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectEnergyen_US
dc.subjectEngineeringen_US
dc.subjectPhysics and Astronomyen_US
dc.titleHydrothermal carbonization of unwanted biomass materials: Effect of process temperature and retention time on hydrochar and liquid fractionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85019564217&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections