Publication:
Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: Collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 53 297 women with breast cancer and 100 239 women without breast cancer from 54 epidemiological studies

dc.contributor.authorE. E. Calleen_US
dc.contributor.authorC. W. Heathen_US
dc.contributor.authorH. L. Miracle-McMahillen_US
dc.contributor.authorR. J. Coatesen_US
dc.contributor.authorJ. M. Liffen_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Franceschien_US
dc.contributor.authorR. Talaminien_US
dc.contributor.authorN. Chantarakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Koetsawangen_US
dc.contributor.authorD. RachawatRachawaten_US
dc.contributor.authorA. Morabiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorL. Schumanen_US
dc.contributor.authorW. Stewarten_US
dc.contributor.authorM. Szkloen_US
dc.contributor.authorC. Bainen_US
dc.contributor.authorF. Schofielden_US
dc.contributor.authorV. Siskinden_US
dc.contributor.authorP. Banden_US
dc.contributor.authorA. J. Coldmanen_US
dc.contributor.authorR. P. Gallagheren_US
dc.contributor.authorT. G. Hislopen_US
dc.contributor.authorP. Yangen_US
dc.contributor.authorS. W. Duffyen_US
dc.contributor.authorL. M. Kolonelen_US
dc.contributor.authorA. M.Y. Nomuraen_US
dc.contributor.authorM. W. Oberleen_US
dc.contributor.authorH. W. Oryen_US
dc.contributor.authorH. B. Petersonen_US
dc.contributor.authorH. G. Wilsonen_US
dc.contributor.authorP. A. Wingoen_US
dc.contributor.authorK. Ebelingen_US
dc.contributor.authorD. Kundeen_US
dc.contributor.authorP. Nishanen_US
dc.contributor.authorG. Colditzen_US
dc.contributor.authorN. Martinen_US
dc.contributor.authorT. Pardthaisongen_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Silpisornkosolen_US
dc.contributor.authorC. Theetranonten_US
dc.contributor.authorB. Boosirien_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Chutivongseen_US
dc.contributor.authorP. Jimakornen_US
dc.contributor.authorP. Virutamasenen_US
dc.contributor.authorC. Wongsrichanalaien_US
dc.contributor.authorA. J. McMichaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorT. Rohanen_US
dc.contributor.authorM. Ewertzen_US
dc.contributor.authorC. Paulen_US
dc.contributor.authorD. C.G. Skeggen_US
dc.contributor.authorP. Boyleen_US
dc.contributor.authorM. Evstifeevaen_US
dc.contributor.authorJ. R. Dalingen_US
dc.contributor.authorK. Maloneen_US
dc.contributor.authorE. A. Noonanen_US
dc.contributor.authorJ. L. Stanforden_US
dc.contributor.authorD. B. Thomasen_US
dc.contributor.authorN. S. Weissen_US
dc.contributor.authorE. Whiteen_US
dc.contributor.authorN. Andrieuen_US
dc.contributor.authorA. Brêmonden_US
dc.contributor.authorF. Clavelen_US
dc.contributor.authorB. Gairarden_US
dc.contributor.authorJ. Lansacen_US
dc.contributor.authorL. Pianaen_US
dc.contributor.authorR. Renauden_US
dc.contributor.authorS. R.P. Fineen_US
dc.contributor.authorH. R. Cuevasen_US
dc.contributor.authorP. Ontiverosen_US
dc.contributor.authorA. Paleten_US
dc.contributor.authorS. B. Salazaren_US
dc.contributor.authorN. Aristizabelen_US
dc.contributor.authorA. Cuadrosen_US
dc.contributor.authorA. Bacheloten_US
dc.contributor.authorM. G. Lêen_US
dc.contributor.authorJ. Deaconen_US
dc.contributor.authorJ. Petoen_US
dc.contributor.authorC. N. Tayloren_US
dc.contributor.authorE. Alfandaryen_US
dc.contributor.authorB. Modanen_US
dc.contributor.authorE. Ronen_US
dc.contributor.authorG. D. Friedmanen_US
dc.contributor.authorR. A. Hiatten_US
dc.contributor.authorT. Bishopen_US
dc.contributor.authorJ. Kosmeljen_US
dc.contributor.authorM. Primic-Zakeljen_US
dc.contributor.authorB. Ravniharen_US
dc.contributor.authorJ. Stareen_US
dc.contributor.authorW. L. Beesonen_US
dc.contributor.authorG. Fraseren_US
dc.contributor.authorD. S. Allenen_US
dc.contributor.authorR. D. Bulbrooken_US
dc.contributor.authorJ. Cuzicken_US
dc.contributor.authorI. S. Fentimanen_US
dc.contributor.authorJ. L. Haywarden_US
dc.contributor.authorD. Y. Wangen_US
dc.contributor.authorR. L. Hansonen_US
dc.contributor.authorM. C. Leskeen_US
dc.contributor.authorM. C. Mahoneyen_US
dc.contributor.authorP. C. Nascaen_US
dc.contributor.authorA. O. Varmaen_US
dc.contributor.authorA. L. Weinsteinen_US
dc.contributor.otherAmerican Cancer Societyen_US
dc.contributor.otherEmory Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherIRCCS Centro Di Riferimento Oncologico Avianoen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherJohns Hopkins Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Queenslanden_US
dc.contributor.otherBritish Colombia Cancer Agencyen_US
dc.contributor.otherMRC Biostatistics Uniten_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Hawaii Systemen_US
dc.contributor.otherCenters for Disease Control and Preventionen_US
dc.contributor.otherCentral Institute of Cancer Researchen_US
dc.contributor.otherBrigham and Women's Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherChiang Mai Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherChulalongkorn Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherFood Science Australiaen_US
dc.contributor.otherKraeftens Bekaempelseen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Otagoen_US
dc.contributor.otherIstituto Europeo di Oncologiaen_US
dc.contributor.otherFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Centeren_US
dc.contributor.otherInsermen_US
dc.contributor.otherHolly Lodgeen_US
dc.contributor.otherHospital General de Mexicoen_US
dc.contributor.otherHospital Universitarioen_US
dc.contributor.otherInstitut de Cancerologie Gustave Roussyen_US
dc.contributor.otherThe Institute of Cancer Research, Londonen_US
dc.contributor.otherIsrael Chaim Sheba Medical Centeren_US
dc.contributor.otherKaiser Permanenteen_US
dc.contributor.otherCancer Research UKen_US
dc.contributor.otherOnkoloski institut Ljubljanaen_US
dc.contributor.otherLoma Linda University Adventist Health Sciences Centeren_US
dc.contributor.otherSkånes universitetssjukhusen_US
dc.contributor.otherMaastricht Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of the Philippines Manilaen_US
dc.contributor.otherIstituto 'Mario Negri'en_US
dc.contributor.otherDivisione di Statistica Medica e Biometriaen_US
dc.contributor.otherIstituto di Statistica Medica e Biometriaen_US
dc.contributor.otherNairobi Centre for Research in Reproductionen_US
dc.contributor.otherNational Cancer Instituteen_US
dc.contributor.otherNational Institute of Child Health and Human Developmenten_US
dc.contributor.otherNational University of Singaporeen_US
dc.contributor.otherThe Netherlands Cancer Instituteen_US
dc.contributor.otherNEW JERSEY STATE DEPT OF HEALTHen_US
dc.contributor.otherColumbia University Medical Centeren_US
dc.contributor.otherOntario Cancer Treatment and Research Foundationen_US
dc.contributor.otherClinical Trial Service Uniten_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Costa Ricaen_US
dc.contributor.otherMedical Center of Fudan Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherShanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Researchen_US
dc.contributor.otherTianjin Cancer Institute and Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversitetet i Tromsoen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Chileen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Edinburghen_US
dc.contributor.otherThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hillen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Nottinghamen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Southern Californiaen_US
dc.contributor.otherUppsala Universiteten_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Wisconsinen_US
dc.contributor.otherOrganisation Mondiale de la Santeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T07:29:13Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T07:29:13Z
dc.date.issued1996-06-22en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer has brought together and reanalysed the worldwide epidemiological evidence on the relation between breast cancer risk and use of hormonal contraceptives. Methods: Individual data on 53 297 women with breast cancer and 100 239 women without breast cancer from 54 studies conducted in 25 countries were collected, checked, and analysed centrally. Estimates of the relative risk for breast cancer were obtained by a modification of the Mantel-Haenszel method. All analyses were stratified by study, age at diagnosis, parity, and, where appropriate, the age a woman was when her first child was born, and the age she was when her risk of conception ceased. Findings: The results provide strong evidence for two main conclusions. First, while women are taking combined oral contraceptives and in the 10 years after stopping there is a small increase in the relative risk of having breast cancer diagnosed (relative risk [95% Cl] in current users 1·24 [1·15-1·33], 2p<0·00001; 1-4 years after stopping 1·6 [1·08-1·23], 2p=0·00001; 5-9 years after stopping 1·07 [1·02-1·13], 2p=0·009). Second, there is no significant excess risk of having breast cancer diagnosed 10 or more years after stopping use (relative risk 1·01 [0·96-1·05], NS). The cancers diagnosed in women who had used combined oral contraceptives were less advanced clinically than those diagnosed in women who had never used these contraceptives: for ever-users compared with never-users, the relative risk for tumours that had spread beyond the breast compared with localised tumours was 0·88 (0·81-0·95; 2p=0·002). There was no pronounced variation in the results for recency of use between women with different background risks of breast cancer, including women from different countries and ethnic groups, women with different reproductive histories, and those with or without a family history of breast cancer. The studies included in this collaboration represent about 90% of the epidemiological information on the topic, and what is known about the other studies suggests that their omission has not materially affected the main conclusions. Other features of hormonal contraceptive use such as duration of use, age at first use, and the dose and type of hormone within the contraceptives had little additional effect on breast cancer risk, once recency of use had been taken into account. Women who began use before age 20 had higher relative risks of having breast cancer diagnosed while they were using combined oral contraceptives and in the 5 years after stopping than women who began use at older ages, but the higher relative risks apply at ages when breast cancer is rare and, for a given duration of use, earlier use does not result in more cancers being diagnosed than use beginning at older ages. Because breast cancer incidence rises steeply with age, the estimated excess number of cancers diagnosed in the period between starting use and 10 years after stopping increases with age at last use: for example, among 10 000 women from Europe or North America who used oral contraceptives from age 16 to 19, from age 20 to 24, and from age 25 to 29, respectively, the estimated excess number of cancers diagnosed up to 10 years after stopping use is 0·5 (95% Cl 0·3-0·7), 1·5 (0·7-2·3), and 4·7 (2·7-6·7). Up to 20 years after cessation of use the difference between ever-users and never-users is not so much in the total number of cancers diagnosed, but in their clinical presentation, with the breast cancers diagnosed in ever-users being less advanced clinically than those diagnosed in never-users. The relation observed between breast cancer risk and hormone exposure is unusual, and it is not possible to infer from these data whether it is due to an earlier diagnosis of breast cancer in ever-users, the biological effects of hormonal contraceptives, or a combination of reasons. Interpretation: Women who are currently using combined oral contraceptives or have used them in the past 10 years are at a slightly increased risk of having breast cancer diagnosed, although the additional cancers diagnosed tend to be localised to the breast. There is no evidence of an increase in the risk of having breast cancer diagnosed 10 or more years after cessation of use, and the cancers diagnosed then are less advanced clinically than the cancers diagnosed in never-users.en_US
dc.identifier.citationLancet. Vol.347, No.9017 (1996), 1713-1727en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90806-5en_US
dc.identifier.issn01406736en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-0242390079en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/17726
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0242390079&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleBreast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: Collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 53 297 women with breast cancer and 100 239 women without breast cancer from 54 epidemiological studiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0242390079&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections