Publication:
Psychometric properties of a Thai version of the Richards-Campbell sleep questionnaire

dc.contributor.authorNuanprae Kitisinen_US
dc.contributor.authorPawit Somnukeen_US
dc.contributor.authorNapat Thikomen_US
dc.contributor.authorNattaya Raykateerarojen_US
dc.contributor.authorNisa Poontongen_US
dc.contributor.authorChayanan Thanakiattiwibunen_US
dc.contributor.authorKaruna Wongtangmanen_US
dc.contributor.otherSiriraj Hospitalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T11:18:39Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T11:18:39Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: In critically ill patients, a poor sleep quality can escalate mortality and the length of hospital stays. Albeit being the gold standard for sleep assessment, polysomnography (PSG) is expensive and complicated. The Richards-Campbell sleep questionnaire (RCSQ) is another tool with proof of good correlation with PSG. RCSQ was translated into many languages. However, the Thai version (T-RCSQ) has not been developed. Aims and objectives: Our study aimed to translate the original RCSQ into Thai, to test the content validity and reliability, and to introduce the questionnaire into clinical practice at the surgical intensive care unit (SICU). Design: Prospective cross-sectional study. Methods: This study enrolled 92 patients from the SICU between August 2019 and January 2020. The content validity of T-RCSQ was determined by the index of item-objective congruence (IOC). The reliability was tested by test-retest reliability at 7 am and 9 am after intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The internal consistency was expressed by Cronbach's alpha. Patients' demography was reported as percentage, mean and standard deviation, and median and interquartile range. Results: The content validity and test-retest reliability of the T-RCSQ were 0.8 and 0.97, respectively. The internal consistency was 0.964. Most patients were female with American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status III. The mean RCSQ scores at 7 am and 9 am were 5.82 ± 2.15 cm and 5.61 ± 2.18 cm, respectively. Conclusions: The T-RCSQ is reliable and could be used as an alternative to PSG for sleep assessment of ICU patients. Further research is required to validate the T-RCSQ against PSG and to assess its impact on improving sleep quality and patients' clinical outcomes. Relevance to clinical practice: T-RCSQ is a useful tool for sleep assessment in ICU. According to cost-effectiveness, convenience, and good reliability, it could be applied to determine proper sleep to minimize patient morbidity and mortality.en_US
dc.identifier.citationNursing in Critical Care. (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/nicc.12705en_US
dc.identifier.issn14785153en_US
dc.identifier.issn13621017en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85113241873en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/78925
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85113241873&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectNursingen_US
dc.titlePsychometric properties of a Thai version of the Richards-Campbell sleep questionnaireen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85113241873&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections