Publication:
Geographic expansion of artemisinin resistance

dc.contributor.authorOlaf Mülleren_US
dc.contributor.authorGuang Yu Luen_US
dc.contributor.authorLorenz Von Seidleinen_US
dc.contributor.otherYangzhou University Medical Collegeen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversität Heidelbergen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T09:55:00Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T09:55:00Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-17en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2019 Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. Background: Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) is the global standard of care for uncomplicated falciparum malaria. First reports of ACT resistance came from western Cambodia and the Thailand-Cambodia border in 2002-2004. The subsequent emergence and expansion of Plasmodium falciparum strains resistant to the artemisinin component and ACT are now threatening the efficacy of falciparum malaria treatment. Methods: We performed a literature review on the history and the current degree of geographic expansion of artemisinin and ACT resistance. Resistance against artemisinins is defined as >5% of patients carrying PfKelch13 (K13) mutations, all of whom have been found to have persistent parasitaemia by microscopy on Day 3 after treatment. Results: Several studies including the multi-centre Tracking Resistance to Artemisinin Collaboration study investigated artemisinin resistance in Southeast Asia and beyond and demonstrated increasing prevalence of P. falciparum infections with slow parasite clearance rates in the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS). K13 mutations were strongly associated with delayed P. falciparum parasite clearance, and the prevalence of the mutation PfKelch13 C580Y is increasing in the GMS. Resistance to ACT regimens is now well established in western Cambodia and in eastern Thailand, southern Laos and southern Vietnam. Moreover, the prevalence of slow P. falciparum parasite clearance has continuously increased over the past 10-15 years at the Thailand-Myanmar border, in nearly all regions of Myanmar, and at the Myanmar-China border. Conclusion: Multidrug resistant malaria is a rapidly increasing problem, but fortunately still limited to Southeast Asia, in particular to the GMS. In the long-Term it may threaten global progress in malaria control but is not yet of concern with regards to malaria prophylaxis, as ACTs are not used for prevention in travellers, current ACT regimens are still effective in most malaria endemic areas outside the GMS and the preferred travellers' prophylaxis atovaquone-proguanil and doxycycline remain protective. However, artemsinin resistance in the GMS is of real concern to travellers as it will affect the choice of malaria treatment including standby-emergence treatment.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Travel Medicine. Vol.26, No.4 (2019)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jtm/taz030en_US
dc.identifier.issn17088305en_US
dc.identifier.issn11951982en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85067268350en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/51720
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85067268350&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleGeographic expansion of artemisinin resistanceen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85067268350&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections