Publication:
The Effect of Memory Training on Memory Control Beliefs in Older Adults with Subjective Memory Complaints

dc.contributor.authorKitikan Thana-Udomen_US
dc.contributor.authorPrabha Siddarthen_US
dc.contributor.authorKaren J. Milleren_US
dc.contributor.authorJennifer J. Dunkinen_US
dc.contributor.authorGary W. Smallen_US
dc.contributor.authorLinda M. Ercolien_US
dc.contributor.otherVA San Diego Healthcare Systemen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of California, Los Angelesen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherJane & Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience & Human Behavioren_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-03T04:52:09Z
dc.date.available2021-02-03T04:52:09Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. Objective: To study whether memory control beliefs predict response to memory training, or change as a result of participating in memory training. Methods: Eighty community based participants with subjective memory complaints Community-based study at UCLA were randomized to one of three conditions: Memory Training, the program consisted of weekly 120-minute classes featuring instruction in three specific strategies: Method of Loci; Chunking Technique; and Face-Name Association, Health Education or Wait-List over seven weeks. All participants underwent pre- and 1-week post-intervention follow-up memory testing for recalling word lists (in serial order and any order) and face-name pairs. Memory control beliefs were assessed at baseline and follow-up using the Memory Controllability Inventory, which consists of four subscales; Present Ability; Potential Improvement; Effort Utility; and Inevitable Decrement. Results: Sixty-three participants (mean age [SD] 68.3 [6.7] years) were included in the analysis. ANCOVA revealed significant group differences in the Present Ability subscale, F2,58 = 4.93, p =.01. Participants in the Memory Training group significantly improved on the Present Ability subscale compared to the Health Education group (mean difference =.96, SE =.31, p =.003, effect size = 0.93). From regression analyses, baseline Memory Controllability Inventory subscales did not significantly predict memory performance after memory training. Conclusions: Baseline memory control beliefs did not predict memory performance following the intervention, but participating in memory training enhanced memory control beliefs about current memory function. These results suggest that participating in memory training can enhance confidence in one’s memory ability.en_US
dc.identifier.citationExperimental Aging Research. (2020)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/0361073X.2020.1861841en_US
dc.identifier.issn10964657en_US
dc.identifier.issn0361073Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85098566445en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/60864
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85098566445&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectArts and Humanitiesen_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectPsychologyen_US
dc.titleThe Effect of Memory Training on Memory Control Beliefs in Older Adults with Subjective Memory Complaintsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85098566445&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections