Publication:
Comparison of three PCR primer sets for diagnosis of septicemic melioidosis

dc.contributor.authorMongkol Kunakornen_US
dc.contributor.authorKanchana Raksakaiten_US
dc.contributor.authorChavachol Sethaudomen_US
dc.contributor.authorRasana W. Sermswanen_US
dc.contributor.authorTararaj Dharakulen_US
dc.contributor.otherFac. Med.en_US
dc.contributor.otherThe Institute of Science and Technology for Research and Development, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherKhon Kaen Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-07T09:12:27Z
dc.date.available2018-09-07T09:12:27Z
dc.date.issued2000-02-05en_US
dc.description.abstractSeveral sets of PCR primers have recently been developed for detection of Burkholderia pseudomallei. In this report, the performance of 16S rRNA gene primers (16S), rRNA spacer gene primers (spacer), and 'LPS' primers (LPS) were compared. All primer sets were tested by PCR amplification of the same DNA samples extracted from blood specimens of 46 patients from northeastern Thailand, of which 29 had melioidosis based on blood culture as a gold standard. The sensitivities were 41, 35,7, and 31% while the specificities were 47, 59, and 100%. for the 16S, spacer, and LPS primers, respectively. The positive predictive values were 60, 59, and 100%, while negative predictive values were 35, 34, and 46%, for these primers. The low sensitivity of PCR was suspected to be because of small numbers of bacteria in the samples. In addition, one primer set could not detect all B. pseudomallei strains. To make PCR for melioidosis more practical, bacterial concentration steps must be added. Lastly, mixed infection of patients in endemic areas may be the cause of controversial false positive PCR results, and should be further investigated. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.en_US
dc.identifier.citationActa Tropica. Vol.74, No.2-3 (2000), 247-251en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0001-706X(99)00077-7en_US
dc.identifier.issn0001706Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-0033979699en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/25997
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0033979699&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleComparison of three PCR primer sets for diagnosis of septicemic melioidosisen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0033979699&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections