Publication:
Characterization and compositional analysis of agricultural crops and residues for ethanol production in California

dc.contributor.authorNatthiporn Aramrueangen_US
dc.contributor.authorSteven M. Zicarien_US
dc.contributor.authorRuihong Zhangen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of California, Davisen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-21T06:34:40Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T08:02:31Z
dc.date.available2018-12-21T06:34:40Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T08:02:31Z
dc.date.issued2017-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2017 This study was carried out in order to analyze characteristic and composition of crops, crop wastes, and residues including a variety of sugar beets and melons, tomato, Jose tall wheatgrass, wheat hay, and wheat straw in California. Ethanol potential was estimated from different scenarios in using carbon sources of feedstock during fermentation, including the new information of using pectin–derived galacturonic acid for ethanol production. Sugar beet appears more favorable than other feedstocks because of its high sugar content (67–75% dry basis, db) and the highest crop yield, resulting in the greatest ethanol potential of 591 m3Gg−1db when all carbohydrates are used during fermentation, with the California area–based potential of 1273 m3km−2. Fermentation of polygalacturonic acid can increase the ethanol potential of sugar beet leaves up to 30% over the fermentation of hexoses alone, increasing the theoretical ethanol potential to 340 m3Gg−1and the area–based yield of 497 m3km−2. Melons and tomato containing 42–69% by mass of soluble sugars showed ethanol potentials in a range of 448–545 m3Gg−1db and the area–based yield of 25–53 m3km−2. The theoretical ethanol yield from lignocellulosic feedstocks tested can be maximized up to 470–533 m3Gg−1db and 291–300 m3km−2when the primary components from cellulose (27–39% db) and hemicellulose (26–30% db) are utilized. The information on composition and ethanol potential is important for determining biofuel feedstock and developing technology for efficient use of bioresource.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBiomass and Bioenergy. Vol.105, (2017), 288-297en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.07.013en_US
dc.identifier.issn18732909en_US
dc.identifier.issn09619534en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85026352289en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/41551
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85026352289&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectEnergyen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.titleCharacterization and compositional analysis of agricultural crops and residues for ethanol production in Californiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85026352289&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections