Publication:
Effects of a restrictive fluid regimen in pediatric patients undergoing major abdominal surgery

dc.contributor.authorSahatsa Mandeeen_US
dc.contributor.authorWassana Butmangkunen_US
dc.contributor.authorNaiyana Aroonpruksakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorNiramol Tantemsapyaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBenno Von Bormannen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuwannee Suraseranivongseen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-23T10:45:34Z
dc.date.available2018-11-23T10:45:34Z
dc.date.issued2015-05-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Objective To investigate the effects of restrictive fluid regimen during major abdominal surgery in pediatric patients. Background In adults, a restrictive and goal-directed regimen as opposed to a liberal-fluid regimen results in better outcomes after various major surgical procedures. The different ratio of body fluid distribution in pediatric patients from those of adults may influence different needs of fluid. Methods This stratified, randomized, controlled trial was conducted in 25 pediatric patients (mean age <3 years) undergoing major abdominal surgery. Patients were allocated to two groups based on their perioperative fluid management. 'control group' received maintenance plus deficit plus interstitial space replacement plus ongoing loss, whereas 'restrictive group' had a similar treatment, but were given no interstitial space replacement. Intraoperative fluid resuscitation was guided by hemodynamics and base excess. Parameters recorded included hemodynamic variables, the volume and type of intravenous fluid, blood chemistry (including lactate, base excess, and electrolyte), chest X-ray, body weight, complications, and return of bowel function. Results Patients in control group needed significantly less additional fluid for resuscitation compared to restrictive group (0.62 ± 3.51 ml·kg-1·h-1vs 5.04 ± 4.16 ml·kg-1·h-1; P = 0.012). In restrictive group, heart rates were higher (P = 0.012) and base excess showed more negative results (P = 0.049). There were no differences between the groups in terms of the total volume requirement, postoperative kidney function, chest X-ray, variation of body weight and the postoperative outcomes. Conclusions Volume preload corresponding with an estimated interstitial space replacement was suitable for application to pediatric patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPaediatric Anaesthesia. Vol.25, No.5 (2015), 530-537en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/pan.12589en_US
dc.identifier.issn14609592en_US
dc.identifier.issn11555645en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84926526966en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/36447
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84926526966&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleEffects of a restrictive fluid regimen in pediatric patients undergoing major abdominal surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84926526966&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections